Entry tags:
Now Californians find out they don't have flood insurance!
*sigh*
47% of Americans surveyed think that flood protection comes with homeowner's insurance. It does not. It is an add-on policy. It not only protects you against things like the massive California floods, but also if your water heater bursts and damages the floor and carpets, or pipes in the ceiling leak and you have problems up there.
It's not a bad idea.
Californians? Apparently only 1.3% of them have flood insurance.
Oh my, do they have a wake-up call coming! And with Republicans in charge of the House - which allocates the nation's finances - and their broad hatred of things California, I would expect any sort of major financial relief to be quite stingy.
https://gizmodo.com/california-is-in-for-a-flood-insurance-wake-up-call-1850001122
47% of Americans surveyed think that flood protection comes with homeowner's insurance. It does not. It is an add-on policy. It not only protects you against things like the massive California floods, but also if your water heater bursts and damages the floor and carpets, or pipes in the ceiling leak and you have problems up there.
It's not a bad idea.
Californians? Apparently only 1.3% of them have flood insurance.
Oh my, do they have a wake-up call coming! And with Republicans in charge of the House - which allocates the nation's finances - and their broad hatred of things California, I would expect any sort of major financial relief to be quite stingy.
https://gizmodo.com/california-is-in-for-a-flood-insurance-wake-up-call-1850001122
no subject
no subject
I have no idea how earthquake insurance would work, might be quite expensive if you lived near a major fault zone. We don't have flood insurance, though probably should since the risk of having a pipe burst due to a serious freeze is decidedly non-zero. We're very careful about setting faucets to drip when we know a big freeze is coming: my wife grew up in northern Ohio and went to school at Penn State, undergrad in the Boston area, so she knows snow and prevention/preservation.
no subject
no subject
Yeah. I had a condo in Phoenix and it was in a flood plain. The interesting thing is that some of the condos in the complex were, some were not. I think I had flood insurance, mainly against household problems, I wasn't concerned about century floods.
no subject
no subject
They never think about it when they are the weather victims. :o
Hugs, Jon
no subject
We never had flood insurance in Calif. and I am pretty relieved we moved!
no subject
That said? In different parts of my valley, it really is a necessity, even as much as the valley has done for flood control. And given where I'm seriously considering retiring, I'll totally be getting it.
Back to California, as these sorts of storms become more common with climate change? Yes, everybody who's not east of the High Sierra needs to consider it.
*Said culvert is as wide as a 2 lane street and deep enough to put a 2 story house in. There's also a 30 foot (9M) elevation gain between my house and the top of the culvert, so yes, if flooded hard enough to overtop that? Holy. Shitballs.
Also, I will say that my greater metro area makes national or international news about every 5 to 10 years for flooding. The floods happen in areas where the flood control hasn't been completed, or on the Vegas Strip, which, some 60 years ago was built over the top of the wash that funnels water through that part of the valley -- at the place where it formed a sort of internal delta, so it was deceptive just how much water came through when it poured rain. The first 2 floors of the LINQ parking garage are considered a part of the flood control district, and every local knows that when it rains, you don't go there.
The flood control district would dearly love to demolish that parking garage and install the drainage that is needed, but the property owners don't want to sell, eminent domain would be astounding, and attempts to partner the cost of a demo and rebuild have never succeeded. ~sigh~
no subject
We live at 9,000', in the middle of a national forest and literally on the top of a mountain. There are few places in town higher than ours. We should have flood insurance, but don't. We live in a manufactured house, so all the plumbing is beneath and accessible. Yeah, the insurance is basically for catastrophic water damage, which the California floods certainly fall under!
no subject
The worst part of that is the gov't allowing them to rebuild in the same damn place, in the flood plain, year after year! A lot of state and local governments are now buying out those areas to prevent them from being repeatedly flooded and destroyed and costing tax money.
no subject
no subject
If I lived in a coastal area, especially if I was very close to sea level, guaranteed I'd carry flood insurance! Nowdays it's more a question of when, not if, you'll need it.
no subject
The Feds need to say, Enough is Enough. :o
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yep. It'd also help you if your roof was surreptitiously leaking on you. I think it also gives you add'l protection for your goods if water-damaged, but I may not be accurate on that.