More stories of AI enshittification
Jun. 9th, 2026 07:49 pmFirst up, town leaders screwing over the will of good people.
In 1999, a farmer in Taylor, Texas deeded the town almost 88 acres of land for $10 for the express purpose of turning the acreage into a park.
It has now been sold to a data center developer called Blueprint for $10 million to build a 135,000 square foot facility.
There was zero public input. And the town council says that it is a done deal and cannot be stopped.
https://gizmodo.com/a-farmer-donated-land-for-a-public-park-and-the-city-sold-it-to-a-data-center-developer-for-10-million-2000769211
Next, attorneys using chatbots badly.
A case in the Northern District of Mississippi, an attorney - Tom Withers - is suing the City of Aberdeen for unpaid legal fees. Now, the conventional wisdom is that a person representing themselves in court has a fool for a client, and Tom seemingly is no fool, had two lawyers representing him. The city had two attorneys representing them.
BOTH SIDES filed briefs mostly or completely generated by AI. With hallucinated citations, i.e. citing court cases that do not exist, i.e. BOOOOGUS. Neither side checked their own citations, nor did they check the other side's citations.
The judge was not amused.
ALL FOUR attorneys were fined. But the biggie was that two of them were BARRED FROM APPEARING BEFORE THE COURT FOR TWO YEARS! That's one from each side. THAT is going to be sting as it will greatly reduce their ability to provide representation, and since a city is always involved in law suites, it's really going to hurt his job.
The proceedings were paused, the case was cancelled, and all four attorneys were dismissed from the case.
Maybe Tom should have represented himself. He probably couldn't have done worse.
https://gizmodo.com/judge-cancels-whole-case-after-lawyers-admit-they-didnt-read-ai-generated-filings-2000769668
In 1999, a farmer in Taylor, Texas deeded the town almost 88 acres of land for $10 for the express purpose of turning the acreage into a park.
It has now been sold to a data center developer called Blueprint for $10 million to build a 135,000 square foot facility.
There was zero public input. And the town council says that it is a done deal and cannot be stopped.
https://gizmodo.com/a-farmer-donated-land-for-a-public-park-and-the-city-sold-it-to-a-data-center-developer-for-10-million-2000769211
Next, attorneys using chatbots badly.
A case in the Northern District of Mississippi, an attorney - Tom Withers - is suing the City of Aberdeen for unpaid legal fees. Now, the conventional wisdom is that a person representing themselves in court has a fool for a client, and Tom seemingly is no fool, had two lawyers representing him. The city had two attorneys representing them.
BOTH SIDES filed briefs mostly or completely generated by AI. With hallucinated citations, i.e. citing court cases that do not exist, i.e. BOOOOGUS. Neither side checked their own citations, nor did they check the other side's citations.
The judge was not amused.
ALL FOUR attorneys were fined. But the biggie was that two of them were BARRED FROM APPEARING BEFORE THE COURT FOR TWO YEARS! That's one from each side. THAT is going to be sting as it will greatly reduce their ability to provide representation, and since a city is always involved in law suites, it's really going to hurt his job.
The proceedings were paused, the case was cancelled, and all four attorneys were dismissed from the case.
Maybe Tom should have represented himself. He probably couldn't have done worse.
https://gizmodo.com/judge-cancels-whole-case-after-lawyers-admit-they-didnt-read-ai-generated-filings-2000769668