thewayne: (Default)
ARGH!

This is very breaking news. Tim suffered a stroke a few years ago and had been in poor health, so this is not terribly surprising. Obviously he is best known as Frankenfurter in The Rocky Horror Picture Show, he was also quite good in Clue and any number of other shows.

He will be missed.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/tim-curry-star-of-rocky-horror-picture-show-and-clue-dead-at-80/ar-AA2aZ3Yl
thewayne: (Default)
In 2016, Larry King asked Dolly Parton about her support for the LGBTQ+ community.

“If you’re gay, you’re gay. If you’re straight, you’re straight. We are who we are. I don’t believe that we should criticize and judge other people. I think we should be accepting and loving. We are all God’s children.

“If you’re the fine Christian you think you are, why are you judging people? That’s God’s job. We’re not God. We’re not judges. We’re supposed to love one another. We’re not supposed to judge, and we’re not supposed to take vengeance on other people. That’s God’s job.

“You should be allowed to be how you are and who you are.”

GO DOLLY! I have/had had lots of friends along that spectrum, my sister had three girls: one is gay and the other is now a very handsome lad. When the gay girl announced she was marrying her then girlfriend, my dad announced he would not attend the wedding. Russet and I said we would be there, and my mom asked if we would take her. Of course we would!

And my brother, the sympathetic Christian that he was, said he'd like to punch her in the face because if she wanted to be a man in a relationship, she should be able to take a punch. I never knew what he opinion was of the trans nephew.
thewayne: (Default)
A true Queen of Country, she was taken after a brief battle with cancer. Type of said cancer was unrevealed in the article that I read.

There's just too much of her story to go into. She was star of the recording studio, stage, movies, etcetera. Saturday Night Live appearances, The Porter Wagoner Show, the Grand Ol' Opry, there's just too much.

But there's one thing that has made a huge difference in this country: The Imagination Library. She started it up 31 years ago. To quote the web site: "Dolly Parton’s Imagination Library is dedicated to inspiring a love of reading by gifting books free of charge to children from birth to age five, through funding shared by Dolly Parton and local community partners in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia and Republic of Ireland.

Inspired by her father’s inability to read and write Dolly started her Imagination Library in 1995 for the children within her home county. Today, her program spans five countries and gifts millions of free books each month to children around the world.

“When I was growing up in the hills of East Tennessee, I knew my dreams would come true. I know there are children in your community with their own dreams. They dream of becoming a doctor or an inventor or a minister. Who knows, maybe there is a little girl whose dream is to be a writer and singer.

The seeds of these dreams are often found in books and the seeds you help plant in your community can grow across the world.”


She will be remembered for a tremendous number of things. I hope the kids today and tomorrow who haven't been directly exposed to her music and other media learn of her through her Imagination Library.

https://apnews.com/article/dolly-parton-death-country-icon-87156f3e6a1547b88bf414529b644ad3

https://imaginationlibrary.com/
thewayne: (Default)
My, oh my. Parents had to pay $10 for this booklet, and rather than pull out a freely available hi-res CORRECT map of the United States, periodic table, and chart of the phases of the moon, apparently someone had an chatbot create these for them and threw them into the master of this year's booklet without any review perhaps other than someone else casually glancing at them and off it goes to print.

To say it is a mess to put it in the kindest possible terms.

Kentucky is Venecky. Etc.

From the WDRB article: "It took Stacey Morris' son just one day of school to spot something was off.

"Mom, did you know that we live in Venecky?" he joked with her on the drive home.

Morris had no idea what he was talking about until she opened the new student agenda he brought home from Farnsley Middle School.

On the pages inside, Kentucky was labeled “Venecky". Louisiana was "Lookoong." Alabama was “Alotome.” Illinois was “Vitoiis.” South Carolina was "Sorth Cuanto."

"Arizona is Arizone. Illinois starts with a V. I mean, it's crazy," Morris said."


My state, New Mexico, seems to be New Mizone.

Gizmodo tried to determine which LLM created this mess, but was unsuccessful. OpenAI and Anthropic produced correct results. But they had a tremendous amount of fun with Google's Gemini when it came to the Misstate of the Union - a map is included in that article and you can click on to zoom out and view it more clearly.

On the Gemini map, I live in the great state of Westangon, whose capital is Austin. To the west of us is the state of Ameroa, Texas is still to the east but seems to have grown a second capital in its north-east which is unnamed, probably to confuse the Yankees.

In the end, Gizmodo was not able to reproduce the map of the USA that the school district had. They postulate that it was either a private LLM or perhaps an older generation model sold to the district and privately hosted. But again, the question is why no one looked at the output, why did they just blindly trust that what it vomited out was correct? Are six year-olds who can't reliably proof this material responsible for putting it together? Or just people with the mental level of six year-olds?

All they had to do was take the previous year's book which they should have had in some electronic format and edit it for the new school year's calendar, change names and dates, put in a new 'Welcome to the school year' from the head of the school, and they're good. Instead they ended up with this mess.

As another president of the United States once said, "Why is our kids not learning?" I think we have another answer. Those kids are now teaching the current kids.

https://www.wdrb.com/news/venecky-instead-of-kentucky-jcps-middle-school-parents-suspect-school-agendas-are-ai-generated/article_c0d3bef9-bda3-454b-8606-9cf3c5a6178d.html

https://gizmodo.com/which-ai-chatbot-did-this-school-use-to-make-such-a-ridiculous-map-2000800045
thewayne: (Default)
Swift, more formally named the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, is a gamma-ray observatory that was launched twenty-two years ago with a two-year expected life. Needless to say, the science community have more than gotten their money's worth out of it. Sadly, its orbit has decayed to the doomsday point where it will re-enter the atmosphere later this year and that will be that for Swift.

But wait! What is that I hear? Hoofbeats of the cavalry coming over the horizon?!

Less than a year ago, NASA awarded a contract to Katalyst Space Technologies to try to mount a rescue mission. They got $30 million to try to save the observatory, which cost around half a billion dollars when it launched in 2004, almost $900 million in today's dollars. That is a good investment.

Katalyst's spacecraft, named Link, launched in early July. It's described as being about the size of a refrigerator, has three robotic arms, maneuvering thrusters, solar panels, and enough fuel to boost Swift into a higher orbit. And things went great - initially. Then something went wrong, and Link started spinning uncontrollably. Two of the three reaction wheels stopped working, along with a couple of lesser problems. They tried to literally reboot the craft, but apparently that did not improve the situation.

(Reaction wheels are like gyroscopes: heavy wheels that rotate at high speed that point in different axes. By braking and accelerating different ones, you can more easily re-point the spacecraft to different directions without spending as much fuel, or do it more quickly while burning more fuel.)

And now NASA has pronounced the mission a loss. And Swift will die.

That doesn't mean that the money has been wasted: it was a very high-risk gamble and it didn't quite pay off. Still, a lot has been learned from the production and launch of Link, and it means a lot to a subset of the space industry that is trying to develop platforms that can boost satellites to higher orbits to extend their operational lifetime. They're also hoping that, given time, these service satellites will be able to refuel and effect repairs and possibly updates on satellites.

That's a lot of ambition, and I wish them success. It'll take them a while to achieve it, but it's better than all of this crap up there de-orbiting on a regular basis and polluting the upper atmosphere.

https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/08/nasa-calls-off-mission-to-rescue-swift-gamma-ray-observatory/
thewayne: (Default)
Several libraries in Nova Scotia were facing closure, Rachel Reid's donation will give them another six months' breathing room to hopefully address a funding shortfall.

From the article: “I credit my local library for being a huge part of the reason I’m a published author today,” Reid said in a news release. “As essential community cornerstones, libraries provide free resources, information, assistance, and safe spaces to their residents.

“Nova Scotia governments should be prioritizing libraries, and working to ensure these fundamental branches remain open for their communities.”


The linked article has an auto-start video.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/atlantic/nova-scotia/article/heated-rivalry-author-donates-300000-to-nova-scotia-libraries/
thewayne: (Default)
You've heard me rail against relying upon The Cloud as your sole source for anything. As the phrase FAFO goes, a PBS station in St. Louis is FO that they should have invested in either a local storage network - and 50 TB isn't really that much, or a second or even third cloud provider for redundancy.

The station, Nine PBS, uploaded TV shows, video, and other data going back 70 years to a company called Open Source Storage (OSS). Over 11,000 files. Nine PBS claims most of the data is irreplaceable.

From the article: "Nine PBS’ most recent contract with OSS ended on March 6. Nine PBS says it couldn’t get a response from OSS about renewing the contract in February. The station claims its contract gave it 30 days to retrieve data at the end of the contract. However, Nine PBS says it abruptly lost access to the data when the contract expired. The channel says it then learned that OSS had delinquency status with the Colorado Secretary of State and had ceased operations. As of this writing, the Colorado Secretary of State’s business database says that OSS formed in 2021 and is delinquent." OOPS!

OSS bought server storage from Iron Mountain, a reputable firm for all sorts of archival storage, and used their Denver data center. When OSS ceased to exist, Nine PBS contacted Iron Mountain and offered to pay to get their data back. Iron Mountain refused, saying basically that Nine PBS was not the owner of the hardware nor the company buying services from them, which I think is a reasonable response, albeit sad. Naturally this led to lawyers being launched. A judge ordered Iron Mountain to preserve Nine PBS's information, and on Wednesday ruled that Iron Mountain must had over the data.

Again from the article: "In a hearing on Wednesday, a judge ruled that Iron Mountain must hand over any physical devices holding the data, Current reported today. The judge also said that Nine PBS must find a third party, such as a former OSS worker, who can help retrieve the data within 30 days and without sharing or corrupting data belonging to other OSS clients.

Nine PBS is already communicating with a former OSS employee “who is willing to help,” the report said. If complications arise, such as from the data being encrypted, another hearing will be scheduled. Nine PBS and Iron Mountain must provide updates by September 14."


Iron Mountain's position, which I agree with, is they provide space, electricity, and connectivity for the server rack(s). They have no user/administrative access to their client's computers, which makes it impossible for them to fulfill a request such as Nine PBS's. Otherwise it's single-stop shopping for any government request that comes along. I would assume this is probably standard practice for any multi-tenant hosting facility.

I'm glad that there's progress being made and that Nine PBS may get their data back. I do hope that they've learned their lesson and will multi-home their backups and not have a single point of failure in the future.

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2026/08/pbs-station-fears-losing-50tb-of-data-after-being-ghosted-by-cloud-storage-provider/
thewayne: (Default)
The attack involves leaving Screen Sharing turned on and an open IP port. It was patched last week for recent versions of MacOS, namely Tahoe, Sequoia, and Sonoma. I don't know if the exploit exists for earlier versions of MacOS or not. So if you're running one of those versions of MacOS, PATCH NOW! The vulnerability is rated a 7.1 out of 10.

If you do need to use screen sharing, you should also be using a VPN to do it.

Apple had just released an OS update that fixed over a hundred vulnerabilities, and nine days later released another to patch just this one. THAT is how series this problem is!

https://arstechnica.com/security/2026/08/vulnerability-giving-attackers-full-control-of-macs-is-under-active-exploitation/

https://apple.slashdot.org/story/26/08/14/2213230/vulnerability-giving-attackers-full-control-of-macs-is-under-active-exploitation
thewayne: (Default)
From Doonesbury's Say What:
Percentage of Democrats who believe they could beat up Donald Trump: 75

Percentage of Republicans who believe they could: 33

This is not a difficult fight! Ankle stomp, grab hand and twist. Pretty much over.
thewayne: (Default)
This excludes the workers tricked and forced into working in scam call centers, their bosses are kindly invited to throw themselves into a fire.

Yahoo Mail does a pretty good job filtering spam. But recently, I've been receiving spam USING MY BROTHER'S NAME. And let's just say that I'm not happy about that as his birthday was earlier this month and I buried him last December. I suspect someone got ahold of info from some data broker and linked his name to mine.

But that's not the worst of it.

Last week I started receiving spam email from MY MOTHER. Who has been dead for about five years now. Now, there's actually one very funny thing about this: she never had an email account! I offered to make one for her, she declined. She didn't mind using dad's computer, but she mainly played solitaire and fell asleep there with a chihuahua on her lap and one or two more at her feet.

I don't think this is random name generation because most email just use a first name, not first and last. And receiving it with my mom's name while getting peppered with them in my brother's name just makes me all the more suspicious. And naturally every email is from a different email address which do not include my brother's or mother's names.

Now, regarding phone spammers.

My phone is set to automatically silence unknown callers. If they're not in my address book, I don't hear 'em. If they leave a voice mail, it gets reviewed eventually. Last Thursday I received the following voice mail: "Good Morning, Sophia Perez calling from Bayview Finance. I work in underwriting. Sending this first thing so it doesn't get buried under everything else today. ..." To cut it short, offering me pre-approval on a $41,000 "hardship" personal loan - no mention of interest rate, payments around $456 a month. Well, I'm not a hardship case, and pay off all credit cards to a zero balance every month and have a credit score typically around 820.

Monday's call came in at 5:05pm, and the last part of the message said "Pre-approval window closes today, Thursday, at 5pm." No mention of time zone. Ended with "Have a good morning."

Called again Friday, exact same message, except the window closed at 3pm Saturday.

Darn, I missed both windows.

Sadly, it takes a response rate of less than 1% for these scammers to be profitable, and I'm sure they can hit that. But not from me.
thewayne: (Default)
Need I say anything about what industry is buying all of it? Also, it's most likely sold out for the next five years. You should forget about buying a DDR5 rig and learn to be happy with a DDR4 setup, which apparently memory is pretty cheap for.

That industry cannot fail or contract too soon!

But that is, in and of itself, not really going to provide any relief. Let's say an AI provider fails, and for discussion's sake, all of one data center is owned by that company. So the contents of that data center go up for sale, and you're able to buy an AI server for a screaming deal, loaded with huge amounts of memory and storage.

And most likely the memory and storage isn't compatible with your current equipment. AI servers are much like crypto mining rigs. They're highly optimized for doing very specific calculations and transformations, and won't be plug-compatible with existing equipment. Really serious hobbyists will probably be able to get them to do something useful, and I'm sure someone will port Doom to them, but they won't be useful to a casual user aside from being a dust-collecting museum piece.

I saw a video of a guy who managed to buy a high-speed video card designed for crypto. It was a previous generation card that had been superseded and was too slow for then current needs. He was really looking forward to seeing how fast it would perform on video benchmarks. There was only one problem: IT DIDN'T HAVE A GRAPHICS OUTPUT PORT! All it did was crunch numbers really fast, it didn't output video! THIS is the sort of kit these AI servers are going to be stuffed with.

None of the memory makers will build additional plants because of the risk of the bubble bursting while they're mid-construction. If they break ground with funds committed, all another supplier has to do is lower their price a little bit to destroy them. And the lithography machines required to make memory wafers are insanely expensive! I would expect the people who make those require payment fully in advance. And some AI companies aren't able to buy as much memory and SSDs as they want: they were late to the game and the more established companies already were existing customers and had priority with contracts. These kids that are new to the show won't be able to grow as fast as they'd like, to which I say GOOD.

Another interesting thing to note is that the automobile sector is being very hard hit as cars are so increasingly computerized. I would expect the aircraft manufacturers will feel the same hit. Makes me desirous to make my 2015 Subaru last as long as possible: 186,000 miles on it right now.

GOVERNMENTS are also being hard hit as they need increasing amounts of computers, this is making their costs go up. I can't imagine they're very happy as they have to deal with tight budgets.

While there are definitely good things being done with neural networks and LLMs, AI slop is the thing that's really powering this ridiculousness.

https://www.tweaktown.com/news/113004/memory-capacity-for-all-of-2027-has-reportedly-been-booked-and-sold-with-no-more-dram-or-hbm-available/index.html

https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/26/08/09/0547220/ramageddon-2027-memory-capacity-reportedly-sold-out


But here's the interesting news: from a WaPo article, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta and Oracle Expect a Negative Cash Flow of $125 Billion Next Year!

OUCH! They're throwing so much money into AI that they're all diving deep into negative cash flow? I'm so glad that I have no direct investment in any of them.

From the WaPo article: "Free cash flow, which measures the cash left over after paying expenses and AI infrastructure costs, is now expected to shrink to almost nothing for the five companies combined in 2026, and decline again to negative $125 billion the following year... AI spending by Amazon and Google pushed the companies to an ignominious milestone: They lost more cash in the past three months than any other large U.S. companies, according to S&P Global data. Investment analysts expect Elon Musk's SpaceX to show even worse cash bleeding this week."

SpaceX is down bigly since its IPO, but they did raise a lot of cash to continue its operations. Tesla is also down bigly after its earnings report last week. Breaks my little heart.

Did you know that 'boat' is an acronym? Stands for Bust Out Another Thousand. Though I'd always heard the definition of boat was 'a hole in the water into which you throw money'. Looks like we've found another application for the term.

NO AI COMPANY HAS YET TO PRODUCE A PROFIT. THEY ARE ALL LOSING MONEY, AND BIG INVESTORS ARE STILL POURING CASH INTO THEM IN HOPES THAT THEY'RE FUNDING THE ONE THAT WILL MAKE IT BIG. They are generating revenue, but no where near where their expenses are.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/08/03/one-chart-shows-incredible-reversal-american-tech-companies/

https://developers.slashdot.org/story/26/08/08/1727226/microsoft-google-amazon-meta-and-oracle-expect-a-negative-cash-flow-of-125-billion-next-year
thewayne: (Default)
Sigh.

Now, I realize university enrollment is trending down overall, and launching a new degree program could bring in more students. BUT AN INFLUENCER PROGRAM? Yeah, if there's one thing that the world REALLY needs more of, it's these worthless consumers of air and space. To complete the course, the students must actually do some sort of campaign and gain followers.

I have read so many stories of "influencers" and people thinking they are influencers because they have two or three thousand followers ruining things, that it just makes me queasy thinking about more coming along, all happy because they have an ASU degree! And of course, since ASU has a degree program, other schools will have to launch influencer degree programs too!

I read a lot about the dumbing down of education, and how students have extremely poor long-term concentration. It makes me wonder how horrible the source materials in this course will be.

To quote Leonardo DaVinci, Most men are of naught more use in their lives but as machines for turning food into shit.

The worst insult of this program being instituted? It's home is the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication.

https://www.dexerto.com/entertainment/arizona-state-launches-influencer-degree-where-students-must-gain-real-followers-3391012/

https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/07/28/012244/arizona-state-launches-influencer-degree-where-students-must-gain-real-followers
thewayne: (Default)
Very interesting. The study followed 3.1 MILLION Danish residents for EIGHTEEN years! That's an awful lot of data! They found that an 11.5 decibel change in road noise next to a house, like living next to a freeway or very busy road, increased the chance of contracting Parkinson's late in life by 3%.

Note that decibel changes are represented on a logarithmic scale, so it's hard to explain exactly how much louder that increase is.

We've known for a long time that toxins increase the risk of neurological disease, this is the first documentation that just noise can increase it. Personally, in my very unprofessional opinion, it's not the noise per se that's causing the increase, it's the constant stress of the noise. I live literally on the top of a mountain on a dirt road, I'd be surprised if more than a half dozen cars pass my house per hour. There's a two-lane highway over half a mile away - it can't be seen from here - we only notice it when particularly loud vehicles go by or sirens tear past. It's pretty placid up here. We definitely notice the change in background noise when we go to The Big City and stay with friends or in a hotel for a few days and hear the constant traffic whizzing by.

I think this will be a definite Good Thing with the increased adopting of electric vehicles: lower audio stress for everyone.

The report was published in JAMA Neurology (Journal of the American Medical Association).

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/jul/23/road-traffic-noise-parkinsons-disease-study-health
thewayne: (Default)
Microsoft apparently didn't like their name being splashed across the interwebs in association with LG loading the adware wanting people to buy McAfee antivirus products. They contacted LG, and LG agreed to pull said adware from their control panel software.

YAY! A small win for the people.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/07/microsoft-responds-to-lg-monitors-installing-mcafee-ads-on-windows/
thewayne: (Default)
This is pretty much unprecedented, and the company itself wasn't really expecting it. They were hoping to clear the launch tower, some 100 meters, and instead got 450km (280 miles) into orbit! The only difficulty experienced was when the third stage separated from the fourth: there is a pause before the 4th stage ignites and there should be some separation between the stages during the coast, I'm guessing a short burst of retro-rockets on the 3rd stage, and something didn't happen and the 3rd stage was a bit close when the 4th stage ignited. It didn't cause any problems and the rocket continued normally.

The rocket, the Vikram-1, launched Saturday from an island in the Bay of Bengal at ISRO, the Indian Space Agency.

https://arstechnica.com/space/2026/07/indias-first-privately-developed-rocket-reaches-orbit-on-dramatic-debut-launch/
thewayne: (Default)
Apparently certain models of LG monitors download control panel software to Windows PC when you hook them up. The monitor instructs Windows Update to install software that prompts you to install McAfee Anti-Virus. Gotta suck up that sweet, sweet third-party money that's unrelated to selling monitors!

Nice.

This behavior has been identified across multiple models of monitors, going back at least two years to 2024. While the adware installation is installed with more freedom than the typical Microsoft Store sandboxed app, it is not installing as an admin-level app and is not engaging in any file-stealing/malware-type behavior. So there's that, I guess. And it can be uninstalled.

The solution, of course, would be for LG to release a BIOS update for their monitors to reflash them and remove this Windows Update install. But of course that's not going to happen.

Personally, I've always preferred ViewSonic monitors, I've been using them for literally 30 years. But I'm not in the ultra-high montitor demographic.

https://hackread.com/lg-monitors-install-adware-app-windows-pcs/

https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/26/07/20/1736218/lg-monitors-silently-install-adware-like-app-on-windows-pcs

(tagged under malware even though it isn't because I don't have an adware tag and don't want to add one)
thewayne: (Default)
It was a heck of a game! Spain's offense absolutely dominated for most of the game, but Argentina's goalie was an absolute wall. He was incredible and deserves recognition for it. I would definitely say he was better than Spain's goalie, but Spain's defense was a little better and Argentina had problems getting shots on goal. Poor Messie did not have a good game, I don't know if he was tired or was holding back some to let the rest of his team shine.

Regardless, Spain was undoubtedly the superior team and scored in the 106th minute! There were two other goals by Spain - none by Argentina - but there were fouls with both of them and they did not count. I'm not clear what happened the first time, the second was an off-sides.

The only downside to the event was at the end when a buffoon with bad hair, an ill-fitting suit, and a scowl participated in handing out the medals to the two teams. He even tried to photo-bomb the winners at the end and had to be lead off by whom I presume was the head of FIFA. I imagine the players, being professionals, are used to the occasional downsides of problems with the venues where they play.

I understand this particular clown was a big supporter of Argentina and gave their country an awful lot of money in the not distant past. Bummer day, dude!

I didn't get to watch any other games, but this one was scheduled in a time slot that was very convenient for me to catch, so I did.

ETA:I forgot one very nice thing - Spain is simultaneously holding the World Champoin title in both men's and women's football! That is incredibly cool!

Oh, and the guy with the bad hair got massively booed when his face was shown on the Jumbotron during the singing of the Star Spangled Banner!
thewayne: (Default)
Have you gotten to/finished the novel Death of the Author?

I'm a bit over 20% through it and about to abandon it. To me, thus far, it is not science fiction nor is it fantasy. It's a fictional bio about a science fiction author and her apparent spiral down to her death.

Does it turn into true SF/F? I'm just not seeing it and I have a lot of other reading to do for the votes.
thewayne: (Default)
Oops! Once again, MS fails to correctly implement a documented in plain sight security standard. Not the first time, certainly won't be the last.

I'm going to let the article speak for itself, then do some add'l commenting:
"According to a Fedora community blog post, upgrading to Fedora 43 and the newer Dovecot 2.4 mail server unexpectedly exposed what could be an ancient Microsoft Outlook security problem involving unencrypted POP3 connections. If true, some Outlook users may have believed their email sessions were protected by SSL/TLS while the client silently continued using insecure plaintext connections instead.

That is not a small allegation.

The issue reportedly surfaced after Fedora 43 administrators upgraded Dovecot and discovered that newer versions no longer allow plaintext password authentication over non secure connections by default. Suddenly, support calls started flooding in from Outlook users who could no longer connect to their mailboxes.

What made the discovery especially strange was that affected users allegedly had SSL/TLS enabled in Outlook. Yet many of those same accounts were still connecting over port 110, the old unencrypted POP3 port, rather than port 995, which is typically used for encrypted POP3 traffic.

According to the report, Outlook appeared to ignore the SSL/TLS selection entirely in certain configurations and continued sending authentication traffic over insecure connections without properly warning users."


SO. New distribution of Fedora Linux and a newer version of their Dovecot mail server, and Linux tries to make sure that everyone sticks to published standards to that they play well with all other software that sticks to published standards.

And Outlook installations suddenly start barfing. Presumably on networks using Window PC clients and Linux backend servers. The Outlook clients appear to be configured correctly and show their little padlock symbol, which we're all trained to believe that all the encryption is up and running properly. Yet internally, things are not well in Outlook Land. People were running older Outlook configurations, not realizing that standards had changed or just not bothering to update old clients or servers. The Dovecot servers got updated to new standards, which barred badly configured clients from connecting, such as old and incorrect Outlook servers/clients, and BOOM.

The bigger problem is that POP3 is a very old standard and not really useful for our multi-device world. The newer and much better standard is IMAP. Under POP3, the first device to access an email message pulls it off the server. I have two laptops, two PCs, a phone and a tablet - all of which read my email. Now, in Ye Olde Days, back in the '80s perhaps, you probably only had one computer. If you had a work PC, you may not have accessed your personal email on it because you usually had special software to call up your ISP for mail. IMAP is designed for multiple devices to access your mail: it leaves it on the server until deleted, remembers whether it is read or unread, and remembers what folder you've moved it to if you did that.

Yet we still frequently have to configure that POP3 information when we set up an email client!

Makes me glad that I almost exclusively use web-based email.

https://nerds.xyz/2026/06/fedora-43-outlook-security-bug/
thewayne: (Default)
The James Webb Space Telescope strikes again! Wooties!

This planet, Wasp94A B (I have no idea about the naming convention and why it earned a B), when viewed by Hubble, gave an averaged reading because Hubble is much lower resolution than the JWST, and it just could not produce better data. The primary scientist on this project, David Sing, has been studying cloudy exoplanets for 20 years. When he gained access to the Webb, and started receiving data on Wasp94A B, Webb showed them that the technique of averaged data from the Hubble just isn't a good technique. Looking at in more detail, they can determine that it isn't the full story.

The planet has clouds, and as they traverse the planet's visible face, and they are not water, specifically the clouds are magnesium silicate, a compound commonly found in rocks on our planet! It's not raining men, it's raining rocks! When the trailing edge of the clouds pass, the night cycle begins.

Neat stuff! Not only is the universe weirder than we imagine, it's weirder than we can imagine!

https://www.earth.com/news/astronomers-find-unusual-exoplanet-wasp-94a-b-with-cloudy-mornings-clear-evenings/

August 2026

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
91011 1213 14 15
161718 19202122
2324 25 26272829
3031     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 28th, 2026 04:44 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios