thewayne: (Default)
FTX was the exchange run by convicted felon Sam Bankman-Fried, who is facing potentially decades in prison for his role in mis-managing the company and failing to produce the technology that the exchange needed. The current managers of the exchange have secured around $7billion in assets and will use that to try to repay customers as much as possible, their accounts were frozen in November '22 when the company filed for bankruptcy.

There's one little catch, which will make the customers unhappy: the payback will be in November '22 pricing. In late '22, crypto was in a slump. Bitcoin was trading at $16.8k, it's now at over $43k. But at least they'll be getting money back, which is more than people in most failed exchanges will be getting. All of this is taking place after having reached an agreement with the courts.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/jan/31/ftx-crypto-exchange-cancelled-refund-customers
thewayne: (Default)
Sometimes government has the people's best interest at heart. From the article: "B.C. Hydro CEO Christopher O'Riley had told the court in an affidavit that the data centers proposed by Conifex would have consumed 2.5 million megawatt-hours of electricity a year. That's enough to power and heat more than 570,000 apartments, according to data on the power provider's website."

Almost 600,000 apartments! And with very few jobs created. Lovely. By the way, a number of crypto mining operations are dropping crypto and turning to AI generation. Same rigs, running different software. Still consuming huge gobs of energy.

https://vancouversun.com/business/local-business/crypto-mining-company-loses-bid-to-force-bc-hydro-power

https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/24/02/06/221230/crypto-mining-company-loses-bid-to-force-canadian-utility-company-to-provide-power
thewayne: (Default)
Binance has been very naughty.

They have not been playing by the rules, including the USA's Know Your Customer (KYC) rules and have been instructing U.S. clients to disregard them, which is a violation of U.S. law.

From the article: "Under the settlement, Binance will "disgorge $1.35 billion of ill-gotten transaction fees and pay a $1.35 billion penalty" to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission..."

The KYC rules are in place to try to prevent crypto exchanges from providing havens for terrorists, ransomware extorters, and child sex traffickers.

The additional $1b loss was from withdrawals after the CEO stepped down.

As Binance is worth some $65b, the fine will hurt a bit, but they'll probably survive.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/12/binance-to-pay-2-7-billion-fine-after-hiding-shady-transactions-from-feds/
thewayne: (Default)
Very interesting. Arrests have been made and a computer consulting firm responsible for maintaining systems in the court house has been fired.

The computer rig was not connected to the court's network - apparently it had its own "modems", but it was stealing a significant amount of power, which makes it a prosecutable offense. There is also no indication as to how long the rig had been running. I'm sure the investigation will uncover these points of information.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/11/secret-cryptomining-rig-found-hidden-in-the-floors-of-a-polish-court/

https://slashdot.org/story/23/11/21/2213231/massive-cryptocurrency-rig-discovered-under-polish-courts-floor-stealing-power
thewayne: (Default)
Bank President Christine Lagarde repeatedly advised her son that crypto investments were usually scams and ripe with fraud, but the 30something son knew better than his old fogey mom. And he lost some 60% of his investments.

Lagarde has been a regular for railing against crypto.

I don't understand her saying he lost "almost all" his investments. He lost 60%, which admittedly is a lot. If he'd lost over 3/4ths, then I'd say almost all. But 60%? Clearly most, as that is obviously a majority, but he still has 40% of it remaining, and that's enough to reinvest - assuming he can extract it if that 40% is sitting in crypto funds.

https://www.reuters.com/technology/ecb-chief-lagarde-admits-her-son-lost-crypto-cash-2023-11-24/
thewayne: (Default)
Are we surprised? I hear the sounds of lots of heads vigorously shaking 'no'.

There are two types, largely speaking, of crypto wallets: online and offline. An offline wallet is where the information is written to some sort of physical media and disconnected from any computer or internet connection unless you need to access the keys. Then you have to enter a long password or recovery phrase.

Well, these 'brilliant' people at Prime Trust created an encrypted physical key into which deposits were made, ultimately totaling almost $40,000,000US, including Etherium and Bitcoin. And the actual keys were burned onto titanium objects. At no time were paper or apparently electronic copies of the keys or recovery keys made.

And the physical recovery keys were lost.

And they didn't record the recovery phrases.

And now the money held in that wallet can never be recovered. You can only make X number of attempts before the device wipes out all the data.

Now, here's the great part. The company marketed itself as a "...crypto fintech company designed to help other startups offer crypto retirement plans, know-your-customer interfaces, ensure liquidity, and a host of other services. It says it can help companies build crypto exchanges, payment platforms, and create stablecoins for its clients. The company has not had a good few months. In June, the state of Nevada filed to seize control of the company because it was near insolvency. It was then ordered to cease all operations by a federal judge because it allegedly used customers’ money to cover withdrawal requests from other companies."

I would scream so loud if I found out that my retirement plan had any portion being invested in crypto!

https://www.404media.co/crypto-startup-prime-trust-files-for-bankruptcy-after-losing-password-to-38-9-million-crypto-wallet/

https://slashdot.org/story/23/08/26/0318207/crypto-startup-bankrupt-after-losing-password-to-389-million-physical-crypto-wallet
thewayne: (Default)
Justin Bieber's Bored Ape NFT has gone from $1,290,000 to $56,000 in apparent value.

It's a good thing he's worth around $300mil or we might have to start a GoFundMe campaign for poor Justin!

You're sad for him, right?

Or like me, rolling on the floor laughing and endlessly amused?

A lot of people have bought into this idiotic NFT craze and lost a lot of money. But here is the question: did Bieber actually drop $1.3 x 10^6 on an NFT?

Asdie from Justin, people like Paris Hilton and other celebs bought into the Bored Ape NFT craze and hyped them to the end of the earth. Conan O'Brien was another celeb "purchaser". It's now being alleged that they did not buy these - that the company was using them as compensated promoters. The problem is that in addition to not paying for the NFTs, they also did not state that these are compensate endorsements!

THAT is something that the Securities and Exchange Commission takes a very dim view of!

Several celebs have been busted for doing compensated endorsements of NFTs and cryptocurrency and not making it plain that they're getting paid for it, and have had to pay some whopping fines. You'd think that they or their agent/people would know better. But apparently they're surrounded by a bunch of stupid and greedy people who like being investigated by the Federal Government.

https://gizmodo.com/justin-bieber-bored-ape-price-collapse-million-dollars-1850606250
thewayne: (Default)
The first is the arrest of Faruk Ozer, a Turkish crypto exchange founder. The exchange collapsed, losing over $2B in "investments", and he fled. An Interpol red notice went out and he was caught and returned to Turkey for trial. Over 80 people were arrested in the collapse, including several of his relatives and friends.

https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/04/20/collapsed-turkish-crypto-exchange-thodexs-ceo-faruk-ozer-extradited-arrested-in-istanbul-report/

https://slashdot.org/story/23/04/20/2339229/collapsed-turkish-crypto-exchange-thodexs-ceo-faruk-ozer-extradited-arrested-in-istanbul


Next up, a Seattle startup's former CFO invested $35M of the company's money into a crypto platform that he controlled as a side business. Except that no one else knew or gave permission to move the money into a crypto fund. The fund went bust, all the money vanished.

The only bit of good news is that the company is very well-funded and will probably weather the loss.

https://www.seattletimes.com/business/seattle-startups-ex-cfo-accused-of-diverting-35m-losing-it-in-crypto-crash/

https://yro.slashdot.org/story/23/05/18/2148258/seattle-startups-ex-cfo-accused-of-diverting-35-million-losing-it-in-crypto-crash


In the EU, starting next year crypto exchange will require licensing, will have to report on energy consumption, and transactions on exchanges will have to be traceable. Person to person transactions aren't included in this, unless it is above EU$1,000.

From the article: "To better protect crypto investors, the EU's rules ensure that crypto assets can be traced—just like money transfers—and suspicious transactions can be blocked. They also provide "enhanced consumer protection and safeguards against market manipulation and financial crime," EU lawmakers announced. The rules do not apply to person-to-person transfers but do cover transactions above 1,000 euros from self-hosted wallets any time they connect to wallets hosted by crypto-assets service providers.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/05/landmark-crypto-rules-make-exchanges-liable-for-customer-losses-in-eu/
thewayne: (Default)
First off, terms: A Zero-Day is an exploitable flaw or flaws that the software makers don't know about, and therefore, it hasn't been fixed. Sometimes it takes multiple zero-days being chained together to truly exploit a system.

Bitcoin Wallet: a wallet is where you store the crypto keys that identify you as holding bitcoins. There are two types, Hot and Cold. A Cold Wallet is not available on the internet and is fairly safe. But a BATM needs a Hot Wallet to access your funds, which is connected to the internet.

What happened here was that the BATMs were vulnerable to exploits, and were hit. The exploits let the attackers get to the administrative interface, which gave them access to logs that included crypto keys, which gave them access to people's hot wallets which were then hit.

As the article says: "The incident underscores the risk of storing cryptocurrencies in Internet-accessible wallets, commonly called hot wallets. Over the years, hot wallets have been illegally drained of untold amounts of digital coin by attackers who exploit various vulnerabilities in cryptocurrency infrastructures or by tricking wallet holders into providing the encryption keys required to make withdrawals.

Security practitioners have long advised people to store funds in cold wallets, meaning they’re not directly accessible to the Internet. Unfortunately, BATMs and other types of cryptocurrency ATMs generally can’t follow this best practice because the terminals must be connected to hot wallets so that they can make transactions in real time. That means BATMs are likely to remain a prime target for hackers.
"

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/03/hackers-drain-bitcoin-atms-of-1-5-million-by-exploiting-0-day-bug/
thewayne: (Default)
New report from the FBI says we set another record, up from $6.9B in '21, with crypto investment fraud nearly tripled.

The FBI operates the Internet Crime Complaint Center where people can report such activity, they logged 800,000 calls last year, or 2,000 A DAY. Phishing lead in complains at 300,000.

Wall Street Journal article, may be paywalled:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/americans-lost-a-record-10-3-billion-to-online-scammers-last-year-fbi-says-274d6139

https://news.slashdot.org/story/23/03/15/1435247/americans-lost-a-record-103-billion-to-online-scammers-last-year-fbi-says
thewayne: (Default)
The process is known as washing, wherein people who makes lots of money buy crypto, which loses value, and they take a tax loss. Except they're able to legally buy the same exact brand of cryptocurrency again and go into a wash, rinse, repeat cycle.

Closing this loophole could generate $24billion, I'm not sure if that's annually.

https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2023/03/09/biden-budget-plan-would-close-crypto-tax-loss-harvesting-loophole/
thewayne: (Default)
Crypto mines consist of literally hundreds of PC servers. They need two things, lots of electricity to power them and lots of fan power to keep them cool.

And fans, especially LOTS of fans, generate a lot of noise!

China outlawed cryptomining because of the energy consumption. North Carolina, and many Southern states, have inexpensive power and loose regulations. And an increasing number of cryptomining operators. Residents complain of an almost constant 50+ decibel whine/hum from the mines that can go over 70 dB at times. And have taken to their local governments to issue noise abatement rules and fines and it's members of both political parties that are objecting.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/19/us/north-carolina-crypto-mine-noise-weir-wxc/index.html
thewayne: (Default)
Oh, so very, VERY VERY bad!

It seems that they weren't actually investors. They literally GAVE their money to Celsius!

Turns out that fine print in the contracts that the investors agreed to is rather important.

Celsius was the first major crypto platform to go bust that is finally making its way through bankruptcy court, and the lurid details are coming out, such as the "investors" are completely and utterly screwed if they didn't get out well in advance.

As in a half MILLION of them.

The bankruptcy judge's ruling declared that the contract turned 600,000 account holders into unsecured creditors, meaning that they'll pretty much get zero. What little assets remain will get sucked up by the secured creditors.

The article is quite an interesting read. The founder, Mashinsky, promised returns on their investments of TWENTY PERCENT. Said that banks aren't trustworthy. Well, there's one difference. Bank accounts are insured by the government if the bank goes bust.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/bad-news-for-thousands-of-crytpo-investors-they-don-t-own-their-accounts/ar-AA161DA8
thewayne: (Default)
This is kind of esoteric, but bear with me.

Bitcoin transactions (buying/selling items or transferring "money" between people) are tied to the transaction ledger. To spend Bitcoin (BTC), you transfer an amount - usually a fractional amount of a BTC to another person's wallet. That transaction has to be written to the blockchain to prove BTC moving from Wallet A to Wallet B. At any given time, hundreds or thousands of transactions are waiting to be committed to the blockchain. Until they're written, the funds are in a pending state.

Writing to the blockchain is a competition, it is the mining process. It's an insane computational nightmare that gets progressively more complex. Keep in mind that the BTC algorithm will only allow X number of BTC To be mined, and we're now at a significant percentage of X: once we hit 100%, no new BTC will ever again be produced - EVER. Lots of computer(s)/clusters are mining, competing to be the ones that get to commit the current batch of transactions to the blockchain for a given transaction cycle because there's a reward: they will have produced a batch of BTC! Obviously with the current value of BTC, even though it's taken a beating this year, it's pretty valuable. If you can sell it. Just like saying my comic book collection is really valuable according to the Overstreet Guide - if people will pay that amount. Good luck there!

Normally the transaction cycle commits approximately every ten minutes. Something happened and it took about 85 minutes at one point on Monday! That's one heck of a snafu! I'm curious if a delay of 8.5 times the norm results in a reward of 8.5 times the normal number of BTC.

Now here's the bad part. Apparently the new difficulty level means that a delay like this may happen every 34 days! So about once a month there's going to be a major hiccup in the transaction system and a nasty little delay creeping in.

And there are people who buy coffee and sandwiches with BTC? I think even a delay of 10 minutes to get the confirmation back is unacceptable. With a credit/debit card, the transaction is almost as fast as paying cash, or can be even faster.

While this was specific to Bitcoin, all cryptocurrencies have some form of blockchain system, though the details of their mining operation vary.

https://www.coindesk.com/business/2022/10/17/bitcoin-fails-to-produce-1-block-for-over-an-hour/

https://slashdot.org/story/22/10/17/2059211/bitcoin-fails-to-produce-1-block-for-over-an-hour
thewayne: (Default)
Last year - the entirety of 2021, theft accounted for $2.1B.

My question is whether they can top $4B before 31 December.

The CBS site complains if you have an ad blocker up, FYI.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cryptocurrency-theft-hacker-chainalysis-blockchain-crime/

https://yro.slashdot.org/story/22/10/15/0137213/3-billion-in-cryptocurrency-stolen-this-year-so-far
thewayne: (Default)
Bloomberg is reporting this as being part of the cryptocurrency $2billion freefall.

Yes, I would like to pay an outrageous amount of money for a digital receipt, thank you. May I have some more and how do I subscribe to your newsletter?

It ain't over yet, there was still almost half a billion in trades this month.

The Bloomberg article is semi-paywalled, they give you X number of free articles per month.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-09-28/nft-volumes-tumble-97-from-2022-highs-as-frenzy-fades-chart

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/22/09/28/1427248/nft-trading-volumes-collapse-97-from-january-peak
thewayne: (Default)
Last month, Amazon lost control of 256 IP addresses for three hours due to BGP security flaws. This enabled cybercrooks to take over credentialing authentication and steal $234,000 in cryptocurrency from an exchange called Celer Bridge. 32 accounts were victimized.

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/09/how-3-hours-of-inaction-from-amazon-cost-cryptocurrency-holders-235000/


In the UK, three men were arrested after a community resident reported suspicious activity. Found in their car was a fake police uniform, an imitation firearm, a real taser and baseball bat. Their intent: "...pay a surprise visit to a 19-year-old hacker known by the handles “Discoli,” “Disco Dog,” and “Chinese.” In December 2020, Discoli took credit for hacking and leaking the user database for OGUsers, a forum overrun with people looking to buy, sell and trade access to compromised social media accounts."

Discoli happened to be not at home, and the thugs were so obvious about not being police that they fled and got the real police notified.

Impersonating police and that fake firearm is really going to ratchet up the sentencing.

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2022/09/botched-crypto-mugging-lands-three-u-k-men-in-jail/


"A Florida teenager who served as a lackey for a cybercriminal group that specializes in cryptocurrency thefts was beaten and kidnapped last week by a rival cybercrime gang. The teen’s captives held guns to his head while forcing him to record a video message pleading with his crew to fork over a $200,000 ransom in exchange for his life. The youth is now reportedly cooperating with U.S. federal investigators, who are responding to an alarming number of reports of physical violence tied to certain online crime communities."

Kidnapped, beaten, and forced to record a video begging for $200,000 with two pistols pressed against his head. Florida.

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2022/09/sim-swapper-abducted-beaten-held-for-200k-ransom/
thewayne: (Default)
Cleaning out browser tabs, this really summarizes my feeling on cryptocurrency:

Investor Warren Buffett addressed the annual shareholder meeting today for his multinational holding company Berkshire Hathaway — and said he still wouldn't buy bitcoin. But this time he gave a detailed explanation why. CNBC reports:

"Whether it goes up or down in the next year, or five or 10 years, I don't know. But the one thing I'm pretty sure of is that it doesn't produce anything," Buffett said.... "If you said... for a 1% interest in all the farmland in the United States, pay our group $25 billion, I'll write you a check this afternoon," Buffett said. "[For] $25 billion I now own 1% of the farmland... Now if you told me you own all of the bitcoin in the world and you offered it to me for $25 I wouldn't take it because what would I do with it? I'd have to sell it back to you one way or another. It isn't going to do anything... The farms are going to produce food...."

"Assets, to have value, have to deliver something to somebody. And there's only one currency that's accepted. You can come up with all kinds of things — we can put up Berkshire coins... but in the end, this is money," he said, holding up a $20 bill. "And there's no reason in the world why the United States government... is going to let Berkshire money replace theirs."

Later Saturday Berkshire Hathaway's vice chairman Charlie Munger had an even harsher appraisal of bitcoin. "In my life, I try and avoid things that are stupid and evil and make me look bad in comparison to somebody else — and bitcoin does all three," Munger said.

"In the first place, it's stupid because it's still likely to go to zero. It's evil because it undermines the Federal Reserve System... and third, it makes us look foolish compared to the Communist leader in China. He was smart enough to ban bitcoin in China."


Additionally, all of those computers consume an awful lot of electricity and generate a lot of heat. I could blather on, but I'm not going to bother.
thewayne: (Default)
Coinbase is the largest crypto exchange in the USA. They claim to hold $256 Billion in fiat and crypto currencies as of their latest earnings report. They also lost $430 MILLION in the last quarter, a 19% drop.

Which leads to the possibility in revenue.

And they say that accounts remaining, in such an event, could be seized as part of bankruptcy proceedings and the account holders could be left as UNSECURED CREDITORS, which means that their getting their money back is pretty much zero.

I would definitely move my money out of Coinbase, which will hasten its demise.

Pass the popcorn! Extra butter! Oh, and Penzey's Brady Street topping is good stuff, FYI!

BTW, while we're talking about crypto, Bitcoin is down 50% from its high last year.

Coinbase's shares fell 15.6% in after hour trading after their earnings report, including the above information, was released. There's interesting info in the article on how certain types of wallets held by Coinbase may not be as flexible for people as they might want.

https://fortune.com/2022/05/11/coinbase-bankruptcy-crypto-assets-safe-private-key-earnings-stock/
thewayne: (Default)
This is a heck of a story.

Cryptocurrency is bound to a blockchain ledger that makes everything unchangeable, immutable. This concept is key to what happened. Everything that happens is bound to these blockchain ledgers. Once a transaction is posted to the immutable ledger, it's done. It cannot be changed. Well, sometimes it can, but it's extremely hard. And in this case, probably impossible.

Hashes are also a critical concept. It's sort of a checksum, a computed value that says that a particular value is valid and has not been tampered with. So you have a file, or token, that contains the transaction, plus a file that contains a hash of the transaction to validate it.

There's a third thing: wallets. Wallets are sort of like password managers, an electronic file that contains your cryptocurrency. I don't know if all cryptocurrencies have community wallets, this particular one does.

The Juno cryptocurrency had a problem. And at this point I'm just going to quote the article.

A community vote had decreed that around 3 million Juno tokens, worth around $36 million, be seized from an investor deemed to have acquired the tokens via malicious means. (This in itself was a big crypto news story.) The funds were to be sent to a wallet controlled by Juno token holders, who could vote on how it would be spent.

But a developer inadvertently copy and pasted the wrong wallet address, as reported by CoinDesk, leading to $36 million in crypto being sent to an inaccessible address.


What happened was the developer was sent the wallet address plus the hash of the address. Sadly, he entered the hash of the address, which is invalid. And it was written to the blockchain. And all them Juno coins are now forever inaccessible.

So the 'investor deemed to have acquired the tokens via malicious means' no longer has them, and neither does anyone else.

Cryptocurrency. Vanished into the bit bucket.

https://www.cnet.com/personal-finance/crypto/a-typo-sent-36-million-of-crypto-into-the-ether/

April 2025

S M T W T F S
   12345
6 78 9101112
13 141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Apr. 23rd, 2025 03:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios