thewayne: (Default)
Ah, love the smell of techbro's petulance. While the Republicans took the seat in Florida, which was the other major election Tuesday, that one was unlikely to flip, though it was a possibility. The Wisconsin seat maintains the balance of power in WI, at least it will make gerrymandering more difficult for the R's and gives the Dems a bit of hope for the next election cycle.

Leon spent over $20 mil in the state to sway the election, most likely breaking election laws, but apparently no one is concerned about such things unless Dems were to attempt it.

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/liberal-judge-wins-wisconsin-seat-defying-musks-millions_n_67ec4ef4e4b0923ef8b46e24
thewayne: (Default)
About a week ago, the Cheeto Benito announced that The Muskbrat was giving him $45,000,000 PER MONTH. Of course, it's a major election law violation to give that kind of money to a candidate, much less on a repeating basis, it has to go through a Pac or Superpac, and that's what was going on here.

And now The Muskbrat is walking back The Convicted Felon's claim. Apparently he gave $45mil to a superpac that focuses on get out the vote efforts supporting conservative causes, but will not be making that donation on a monthly basis.

Which is probably a good thing. Like our previous (and cannot be forgotten soon enough) president who demonstrated liquidity problems, it would be kinda embarrassing if he had to sell more Tesla stock to make recurring donations a reality.

https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/elon-musk-45-million-trump-never-pledged-donate-1235066489/
thewayne: (Default)
I've been waiting for this one to be filed. The Muskbrat diverted a hundred or more Nvidia H100 AI CPUs from Tesla to Twitter and xAI without paying Tesla for them. He's also poached a dozen AI workers from Tesla for xAI. A group of Tesla stockholders have filed suit in DELAWARE Chancery Court over this.

The root problem, of course, is that these are independent corporations, not The Muskbrat's personal playgrounds, regardless of how he views and treats them. If Twitter and xAI were subsidiaries of Tesla, there would be no problem - you're just moving resources from pocket A to pocket B in the same jacket. But these are independent companies nominally controlled by one person: The Muskbrat. So he effectively stole scarce resources (the AI CPUs are in very scarce supply and extremely high demand) from Tesla and gave them to another company that is not financially tied to Tesla.

The suit also cites the board as being negligent in not preventing The Muskbrat from poaching talent and theft from the company. Two members of the board are his brother and a long-time friend, who were just re-elected to the board.

In other Tesla news, The Muskbrat's ridiculous compensation package was overwhelmingly approved by Tesla stockholders. HOWEVER, and I do so love that word in this context, we're in unknown ground regarding whether or not a shareholder vote trumps a judge's decision! We're in Wonderland here, and no one knows what will happen next. The shareholders also voted to approve the reincorporation of Tesla in Texas, but that won't eradicate the judge's ruling.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/06/tesla-investors-sue-elon-musk-for-diverting-carmakers-resources-to-xai/
thewayne: (Default)
ROFLMAO! The Muskbrat is going to try to hire back his Supercharger team!

GEE, PERHAPS FIRING ALL OF THEM WAS A BAD IDEA! WHOULD'A THUNK IT!

He's also "committed" (and should be!) half a billion dollars to expanding the Supercharger network.

A lot of the reason for sacking the entire division came from him getting PO'd at the division manager, Rebecca Tinucci, not sacking enough division people. So he fired Tinucci and the entire division.

My question is: how many will be willing to come back under such a mercurial CEO, and how much of a raise will they demand for being treated so capriciously?

A couple of things the article discusses that I did not know is that in '19 he decided to close ALL retail locations to pay for a cheaper Model 3. When it turned out he was going to get the crap sued out of him for breaking so many retail leases, he reversed that decision. Also, apparently plans are going into effect for super-Supercharger stations for charging Porsches and Audis which require more voltage for their batteries.

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2024/05/tesla-does-180-on-superchargers-rehiring-laid-off-staff-amid-new-plans/
thewayne: (Default)
Everybody's favorite game show!

In previous weeks we've seen the Supercharger division shown the door, the new car design group booted, lots of people pink-slipped.

And now?

HUMAN RESOURCES!

EVEN MORE ENGINEERS!

And.... drum roll please....

SERVICE ADVISORS!

So let's see. There have already been reports of service appointments being cancelled for CyberTrucks, and this is BEFORE the number of service advisors were reduced. And now everyone who really knew the Supercharger network is gone, but that's last weeks news, that's going to start crumbling as the techs who service that start getting overstretched and quit. Oh, wait. What techs? Engineers are going away, which probably includes some of those techs. And since we've sacked the HR department, apparently there's absolutely no plans to replenish any of these slots being eliminated. The PR department went away ages ago because there wasn't much of a need to promote Tesla cars, reporters have frequently groused that there was no way to get additional information from the company when 'events' happen. Well, this is one heck of a series of events!

When you lay off X% of people, there are Federal labor laws that come into effect. They're probably well over that number. Things like 60 days notice. Unemployment compensation. Insurance bridges. Trivial things that the super rich don't really bother with.

Lawsuits are going to be piled pretty deep and pretty soon. You can't go around slashing people from a big company like this. When the Big Three automakers announce layoffs, they announce them and then begin working with the unions to comply with the law to do them properly. I guess a certain person thinks that since he hasn't let his workforce unionize that he doesn't have to do anything regarding government law.

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2024/05/tesla-announces-fourth-round-of-layoffs-in-four-weeks/


So, the additional stupidity.

I'm not going to link the article, but the stupidity is truly monumental. It's on the Gizmodo site if you want to look for it. And it involves a CyberTruck.

This idiot - and the idiocy is on both sides, the truck owner and on Tesla - films a video of the frunk (front trunk) closing on a stick and breaking it. Commenters on the video say he did it wrong and it wouldn't break a finger.

So he redoes the video.

And it breaks his finger.

Now here's Tesla's idiocy, aside from it not having safety features to prevent a broken appendage.

If the frunk lid is closing and encounters resistance, most people would think that the sensible programming choice would be that the sensor and computer would say 'I have encountered unexpected resistance and something is preventing me from closing properly! I should reverse and open the frunk lid!'. Nope. It thinks there is a big bag/piece of luggage, and it INCREASES FORCE.

I have no words.

Let's get a drunk person half-in there and see if it'll cut them in half. That'll get some clicks.

Yay social media wannabe influencers!
thewayne: (Default)
To say this makes no sense overstates the obvious.

He fired the director of new car development. And everyone in that division.

He fired the director of the Supercharger network. And everyone in that division.

And remember how he's been saying that Tesla's big new thing was going to be the robotaxi? He just eliminated the entire public policy team. Funny thing: when you're dealing with the federal government, one thing that's very useful is a public policy team.

Two cars in their four car (plus the Cyber alleged Truck) are in desperate need of refreshes. And there's no longer a new car development group. Demand for the Supercharger network is going to grow like gangbusters as most every car maker in North America is adopting their plug standard. And now that division is gone?! It had the potential to be hugely profitable!

Unless he has a really extraordinarily amazing rabbit to pull out of his hat to reveal some master scheme to offset these division axings, somehow I don't think his massive pay package is going to get passed at that upcoming shareholder meeting. In fact, I'd be REALLY seriously looking at shorting Tesla stock.

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2024/04/tesla-to-lay-off-everyone-working-on-superchargers-new-vehicles/
thewayne: (Default)
As expected, in light of the Delaware Chancery Court shooting down The Muskbrat's compensation plan, he's following through on his threat to put reincorporating Tesla in Texas up to a vote. Tesla is having its annual shareholders meeting, where such things are voted on, in mid-June, so such things are filed and announced now. Also up for vote - his pay package of $56 billion! YAY!

Now, the amusing bit was that the reincorporation and pay package were decided by a "Special Committee" which consisted of ... drum roll please ... one person. An attorney who joined the board late December 2018, Kathleen Wilson-Thompson. She is a qualified attorney, at least in terms of degrees and such, and she received over $7,000,000 in stock and compensation the following year for serving on the board.

The Chancery Judge threw out The Muskbrat's compensation package because the Board, in the Judge's words, 'were beholden' to him. How is receiving seven mill in pay and stock not beholden?

It'll be interesting to see if the votes pass. While lots of stockholders are fan bois, there are also large blocks owned by institutional investors, and they're a lot more conservative about things.

And one other thing. He's PO'd about the Chancery Judge shooting down his compensation, also about the Chancery Court forcing him to buy Twitter after he promised to. Those are the main forces behind reincorporating in Texas. But here's the thing: Texas is creating a system very much modeled on the Delaware Chancery Court system! Aside from travel costs, is he going to be gaining very much?

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/04/tesla-asks-shareholders-to-approve-texas-move-and-restore-elon-musks-56b-pay/

A second article on the incorporation move has some very interesting information about Egon's, err, Elon's companies dealings with each other, and this interesting paragraph:

Over eight weeks, Wilson-Thompson’s committee met 16 times for more than 26 hours, and Tesla says she personally spent “more than 200 hours” working on the matter. The Sidley lawyers spent “more than 600 hours each” on the matter and were supported by “more than 40 other Sidley lawyers.” Through this process, seven board directors and five members of Tesla’s management were interviewed.

THAT is a LOT of billable hours!

A paragraph preceding stated that they found that most corporations incorporate where they're located or in Delaware. Geez, pay me $100k and I'll tell you that! Look at how much money you'd save!

https://techcrunch.com/2024/04/17/tesla-x-advertising-musk-stock-package-delware-texas/


Tesla CyberTruck owners: manufacturing has been suspended while Tesla deals with problems regarding the accelerator peddle. There have been reports of the peddle coming loose, including parts of it jamming itself under trim panels and unintended acceleration, including one owner slamming into a light pole! Tesla's taking some time off to implement fixes.

Honestly, they have LOTS of fixes to implement with people complaining about fit and finish, not to mention the rust problem of stainless steel that doesn't have a clear coat applied.

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2024/04/tesla-stops-cybertruck-deliveries-accelerator-pedal-may-be-to-blame/


And finally, Tesla is getting ready to axe TEN PERCENT of its workforce! Now, when numbers like that are about to get the RIF, I think you're at the point that the Feds are involved as that's a major labor market disruption, we'll see what happens.

Tesla's stock has been underperforming of late. While it's up over 600% since 2018, it's down over a third this year to date, and we're only a third into the year. The CyberTruck (AKA the Incel Camino, not my creation) has been a major thorn in its side, the constant price-cutting has really hurt its margins, and now the Model 2 has been axed in favor of a 'Robo Taxi' that hasn't been seen - and with the amazing success of its Auto Pilot, may never be. The Model 2 was supposed to be an actual low-cost model, but rumor has it would not be sold in the USA.

Let's see. CyberTruck: ugly design and bad manufacturing, own goal. Constant price-cutting to prop up market share, own-goal. Dropping a product line in favor of what seems to be vaporware that will run on vaporware, own-goal.

I think I see a trend here.

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2024/04/tesla-to-lay-off-more-than-10-percent-of-its-workers-as-sales-slow/


Oh, and Egon says he'll debut the RoboTaxi on August 8. Set your sundial!

https://techcrunch.com/2024/04/05/elon-musk-says-hell-unveil-a-tesla-robotaxi-on-august-8/


In other news, for which I don't have a link handy, Tesla is trying to push sales of Autopilot by giving every Tesla owner a free 30 day trial every time you take your car in for service with a requirement that a salesman shows you how utterly spiffy it is! I'm just wondering if it will automatically charge your credit card X thousands of dollars if you don't cancel it before your month is up.
thewayne: (Default)
First up, he's being sued by upwards of $200,000,000 by former executives of Twitter. The former CEO, CFO, Chief Legal Officer, and General Counsel allege they are owed wages, health insurance premiums, etc. for unjust termination. Musk sacked them before they could resign when he took over, stating gross negligence, etc., then spent a year trying to get employees to prove said negligence and incompetence. They couldn't. Well, now they're back for blood, and they're likely to get it.

He's showing his true colors as an asshole billionaire: don't pay your bills. And he has multiple suits against him. I really hope they start getting some really nasty punitive damages that he begins feeling the hurt that he's putting on others, and that others flat-out stop doing business with him. Much like a certain former president.

The thing that's really going to hurt him in his defense for this suit is that he confided to his biographer that he did this on purpose, just to save money. That's definitely going to bite him in the butt in court.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/03/elon-musk-sued-by-former-twitter-ceo-over-refusal-to-pay-57m-severance/


In Tesla news, an eco-activism/terrorism group, for want of a better name, burned down a high-voltage electrical tower that powered the Tesla plant outside of Berlin, taking out its power and causing it to shut down an hour or so before the morning shift today. They were protesting the plant's excessive water pollution.

When the Muskbrat was stumping to open the factory, he said that it would internally process the waste so that the water discharge would be clean. Guess what! HE LIED! It's producing run-off six times higher of phosphorous and nitrogen than allowed, and the processing plant can't handle it! So much for properly handling it in-house. And the locals aren't happy.

Now he wants to expand the plant to produce a million cars annually, which will mean cutting down a lot of old-growth trees, and increasing waste output. You can imagine how popular that is with the locals.

Germany is pretty strict with its environmental laws, he's going to have to clean up his act. I don't approve of burning down power towers, but it definitely did bring attention to the pollution that Elon is putting out.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/musk-accused-polluting-german-rivers-132031339.html
thewayne: (Default)
Last week Tuesday a Delaware Chancery Court Judge voided a compensation package for The Muskbrat that would have awarded him over a billion dollars PER WEEK for working for Tesla. Keep in mind he's also theoretically drawing pay checks from the former Twitter, SpaceX, Neuralink, whatever his AI project is called, and who knows what else.

Naturally he took this in good grace and accepted the judge's ruling and promised to assign an independent compensation panel for a more fair package to be decided upon.

HAH! KIDDING!

Adderall (and who knows what else) Boy took to The Social Media Site That Shall Always Be Known As Twitter, and posted a poll asking whether or not Tesla should be reincorporated in Texas. 87% said yes! Vox populi, the people have spoken! Of course the number of those voting in the Twitter poll were probably a vanishingly small number of actual Tesla stock holders. But never mind that. It was enough for The Muskbrat to get up on his high horse and proclaim that the question shall be put to Tesla shareholders whether or not to reincorporate in Texas.

Now, there's a lot of important things to consider here. According to TaxFoundation.org, "Texas does not have an individual income tax. Texas does not have a corporate income tax but does levy a gross receipts tax. Texas has a 6.25 percent state sales tax rate, a max local sales tax rate of 2.00 percent, and an average combined state and local sales tax rate of 8.20 percent. Texas’s tax system ranks 13th overall on our 2024 State Business Tax Climate Index." Delaware rates 21st with an 8.7% corporate tax rate.

But what he's really peeved about is the Chancery Court. They're the ones who forced him to buy Twitter, a stupid boast he made late one night that the Court took in earnest and made him follow through. And it's cost him a lot of money out of pocket, and a lot of shares of Tesla stock that he's trying to recover (previously discussed). The Chancery Court is a pretty cool thing, these judges are specialists in business law, it's hard to get tricks past them as Elon learned. If a deal is bound by Delaware law, it's going to remain bound by Delaware law.

So he's going to try to move Tesla's incorporation to Texas!

Is that a good thing?

You see, Texas just created its own form of a Chancery Court. It goes live later this year. Odds are that they're going to be every bit as hard-nosed about adhering to the law as the Delaware judges are, I tend to doubt, or at least hope, that they're not going to cut him any slack because "He's ELON!" He seems to want judges to be on his side because he's rich, and he's finding out in many cases that judicial systems don't seem to work that way.

Bear in mind that Elon did not invent Tesla. The guys who invented the Tesla Roadster incorporated in Delaware in 2003 for tax purposes and it's easy to incorporate there. The Muskbrat was an early large investor, and eventually effectively turfed the inventors and seized the company. Ever since then, he's more or less run the company as his personal fiefdom since then. He's stuffed the board with friends and family, there's little chance they'll gainsay him on any significant issue. Anything that actually comes to a stockholder vote? Well, we'll see about that.

To give you an idea of how popular it is to incorporate in Delaware, here's this little bit of tid: "The Delaware government says that over 68 percent of Fortune 500 companies are registered in the state, and 79 percent of US-based initial public offerings in 2022 were registered in Delaware." Yeah. Sort of says it all.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/02/elon-musk-proposes-tesla-move-to-texas-after-delaware-judge-voids-56-billion-pay/
thewayne: (Default)
Now, why they would think he wasn't worth $56 billion a year, I just can't imagine!

A shareholder group sued to block his compensation package, saying that the compensation board had too close a relationship with Musk, that it wasn't sufficiently independent. While the compensation package was voted on by shareholders, the judge ruled that they were not properly informed of how close the ties were between Musk and the board, which voted for the package.

From the article: "Musk's pay plan "is the largest potential compensation opportunity ever observed in public markets by multiple orders of magnitude—250 times larger than the contemporaneous median peer compensation plan and over 33 times larger than the plan's closest comparison, which was Musk's prior compensation plan," the ruling said."

But this is the clincher: "McCormick criticized the Tesla board, writing that Tesla Chair Robyn Denholm had a "lackadaisical approach to her oversight obligations." Although Musk and his brother Kimbal recused themselves from the pay-plan vote, "five of the six directors who voted on the Grant were beholden to Musk or had compromising conflicts." This "allow[ed] Musk to dictate the timing of the process and the terms of the Grant," McCormick.

For example, board member James Murdoch "was a long-time friend of Musk before he joined the Board, and they repeatedly vacationed together with their respective families." Board member Antonio Gracias "had business relationships with Musk dating back over 20 years, as well as the sort of personal relationship that had him vacationing with Musk's family on a regular basis."

Ira Ehrenpreis, who chaired the board's compensation committee, was a close friend of Kimbal's and acknowledged that "his personal and professional relationship with the Musk brothers has had a 'significant influence on his professional career.'" Board member Brad Buss "owed roughly 44 percent of his net worth to Musk entities," and "Denholm derived the vast majority of her wealth from her compensation as a Tesla director," the ruling said.

Todd Maron, Tesla's general counsel, wasn't on the board but played a key role in negotiating Musk's pay.

"The working group included management members who were beholden to Musk, such as General Counsel Todd Maron, who was Musk's former divorce attorney and whose admiration for Musk moved him to tears during his deposition," McCormick wrote. "In fact, Maron was a primary go-between Musk and the committee, and it is unclear on whose side Maron viewed himself. Yet many of the documents cited by the defendants as proof of a fair process were drafted by Maron."


Yeah. Must be nice to have the entire board in the palm of your hand for one reason or another.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/01/elon-musks-56-billion-pay-plan-voided-as-shareholders-beat-tesla-in-court/
thewayne: (Default)
Elon is unhappy. Boo and hoo. Since he made his horribly ill-advised offer to buy Twitter and was forced to follow through on the purchase, he's had to sell a lot of his shares in Tesla to keep himself and Twitter afloat: he now holds about 13% of its shares. He wants to remedy that, and his method is to whine to the Board of Directors of Tesla that if they don't award him another 12%, that he might take his toys and go elsewhere. Or invent his new toys elsewhere. Something like that.

This can go three ways, IMO. The board caves and awards him the additional shares. Now, the problem is that the board has troubles of its own, having faced lawsuits and government inquiries that they've been a little too free with giving themselves money. This might look like more of the same and could land them in more hot water. In fact, some board members are banned from taking any compensation for multiple years!

Or they could say no bueno. In which case the Muskbrat walks. Or he doesn't. I expect he has additional remunerations with Tesla that vest over time. If he walks, he'll lose that. So walking wouldn't be in his best interest. And if he walks, and they bring in someone who actually knows how to run a car company who brings in some good managers and innovators who make some serious improvements there - and lord knows they need 'em! - he's going to look like the buffoon that he is.

If he stays, and doesn't get his shares, it's an empty threat. He just lost any leverage opportunity with the Board for negotiating in the future. Which could have some interesting consequences as time goes by. Now, the thing is, it's a Musk Family Crony Board. They probably lean towards caving, or at least negotiating, but there's that whole 'enrichment' investigation stuff fresh in their minds and still hanging over them.

Not a good time! Well, a good time for the popcorn-munching fans of slow-moving disasters, perhaps. :)

https://gizmodo.com/elon-threatens-to-build-products-outside-of-tesla-unles-1851168957
thewayne: (Default)
Yep, another celebrity opening another vanity school project. Exactly what the country/world needs.

The paperwork for a non-profit school was filed with the IRS last year and received its tax-exempt status in March. Apparently he is negotiating with a college conference to take it all the way to the university level.

WHEEEEEEE!

He's committed $100,000,000 of his own money to the project, which will focus on STEM.

Lots of amusing comments on the article, I especially liked the one suggesting it be named the Certified University of North Texas, which would be right on-brand for the Muskbrat. Consider that his space company sounds like "space sex" when pronounced and his car models spell "s 3 x y" when you list them out. The idiot is a frat boy, born with a golden spoon in his mouth from his dad's opal mine in South Africa.

https://gizmodo.com/elon-musk-is-reportedly-launching-a-new-university-in-t-1851097464
thewayne: (Default)
He literally said this, on camera, in front of a live audience, in an interview at the New York Times DealBook Summit.

The event in question: ''On November 15, Musk replied, "You have said the actual truth" to an X post that said Jewish communities are "pushing hatred against whites."

Many major advertisers immediately suspended advertising on the platform or flat-out cancelled contracts due to this on-going shit by the head shit-gibbon.

In the Ars article, he goes on to say "he regretted making the post that kicked off the advertiser boycott. "I should in retrospect not have replied to that one person and should have written in greater length what I meant," Musk reportedly said. "But those clarifications were ignored by the media and essentially I handed a loaded gun to those who hate me and arguably to those who are antisemitic. And for that I'm quite sorry, that was not my intention."

Musk also called it "one of the most foolish—if not the most foolish—thing I've done on the platform."


Well, yeah. We know you're an idiot. You're embracing Nazis, Pizzagate apparently, and you're not doing much to deny or shut down such trolls. And you're wondering why advertisers are fleeing your site?

I appreciate what he's done with SpaceX, it has truly revolutionized space flight, though the concept of colonizing Mars is really idiotic. The only thing that impresses me about Tesla is the nation-wide charging network, the build quality of their cars has massively plummeted. And the fact that he kicked out the guys who invented the car from the corporation just plain sucks. But that's the kind of asshole that he is. He thinks because he was born with a gold spoon in his mouth that he's brilliant. The problem is, he's not as smart as he thinks he is and doesn't appreciate how much privilege his money has brought him, especially that his starting money came from daddy's opal mine in South Africa.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/11/elon-musk-on-x-antisemitism-controversy-dont-advertise-go-f-yourself/
thewayne: (Default)
This is the first time that the UAW has gone against all three at the same time, and it worked. They're getting a 25% wage increase over the next 4.5 years along with cost of living increases and other concessions, so a great win for the union!

This is a tentative agreement, but those are usually ratified.

Meanwhile, Toyota, a non-union shop, increased worker's pay, seeing a huge risk that if they didn't, the likelihood of workers wanting to join a union would greatly increase.

And meanwhile meanwhile, Tesla is in the UAW's sights. The Muskbrat, one of the richest men in the world depending on how stock valuations are doing, is notoriously anti-union and has been fined for violating labor laws on multiple occasions.

https://arstechnica.com/cars/2023/11/the-uaw-beat-the-big-three-elon-musks-tesla-is-among-its-next-targets/
thewayne: (Default)
All of these suits are just for failure to pay for services rendered or contracts in place. In several cases, the suits have been withdrawn by the plaintiff, potentially indicating a settlement.

Absolutely ridiculous. It also details the evictions.

I'd love to see these companies get court approval to file liens against other Muskbrat properties, like Tesla and SpaceX factories and lands.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/09/musks-unpaid-bills-dozens-of-lawsuits-try-to-force-twitter-aka-x-to-pay-up/
thewayne: (Default)
The Muskbro bought the company in October 2022. Many Twitter employees stayed on for the expected and promised annual bonus that was normally paid out in the first quarter of the year, bypassing job offers for new and better positions.

Care to guess whether or not the bonus was paid?

A class action lawsuit has been filed for non-payment, saying over $5,000,000 is owed to current and former employees.

In other news of the Twitterverse, employees of a Denver-area office building - I think I drove past it once or twice - were EVICTED for rent non-payment. The landlord had access to a slush fund and when rent wasn't paid they accessed it, which activated a legal requirement that Twitter replenish the slush fund. They did not, and the landlord began eviction proceedings, which culminated in the building being vacated earlier this month.

According to the Ars article linked below, there are TWENTY lawsuits against the Mustbrat for nonpayment of various services, including the lease on the HQ in San Fran.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/06/musk-owned-twitter-stiffed-employees-on-promised-bonuses-class-action-says/
thewayne: (Default)
This is amazing. Tesla has wireless entry through their smartphone app, or you can wave a bar code under a scanner built in to the driver's mirror. They might also have a fob, I'm not sure. Anyway, Driver A walks up to Car B, it unlocks and starts for him. And he drives off. Then he notices a huge crack in the windshield and his phone charging cable isn't there!

Driver B walks up to Car A, it unlocks and lets him start it. He drives off, notices the crack in his windshield isn't there and there's other stuff in his car that he didn't recognize!

Fortunately Driver B found a piece of paper with A's name and phone number, called him, and eventually they got together, exchanged cars, and had a laugh and lots of puzzlement. They contacted the police who said 'no harm, no foul' and to go away.

But guess what. Now that this flaw is known, every criminal hacker is going to be probing for how to exploit it. And they will succeed.

The ridiculous thing about this is that it was so easily preventable. Presumably Tesla has some sort of an encrypted key exchange going on to try to prevent it, and clearly failed. All they had to do was add the VIN to their secret key and you'd be largely guaranteed that only people whom you wanted to have access to your car would be able to unlock it and drive it.

I sent this article to a friend who had one of the first generation Tesla Roadsters, back before the Muskbrat turfed the inventors. He sold it after I told him about a serious flaw that was threatening all Teslas, which would cost him probably $4,000 or more to remedy. He bought a maxxed-out Toyota Avalon Hybrid, which he absolutely loves. It has a very interesting security feature: lock the door with a key, and the wireless remote won't work!

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/canadian-motorist-unknowingly-opens-wrong-tesla-allowed-drive-away-rcna74872
thewayne: (Default)
Mister "Free Speech Absolutist" sure likes banning people.

There's some interesting history here. Twitter - not the Muskbrat - posted a policy saying that you can't dox people, nor post real-time location information about third-parties. If you want to post real-time location information about yourself, feel free and go wild. The location information is in response to a Florida university student by the name of Sweeney who ran a Twitter account called (at)ElonJet which posted real-time information whenever Elon's private jet was in the air.

Now, Sweeney wasn't spying on Elon. He was using publicly-available transponder information that was available on the web. He wrote a bot that scraped the transponder information and posted it on Twitter whenever it changed. He does the same for Bill Gates, Air Force One, and a few other prominent individuals. He also posts it to Instagram and other social media sites. He also uses similar tech to post the locations of business mogul' super yachts.

This infuriates Elon. "IT'S A THREAT TO MY PERSONAL SECURITY!" This reached a head earlier this week in LA when some loon jumped on the hood of the car transporting his child, X-13 Rocket Plane, or whatever its name is, and he blames Sweeney. Next day the Twitter ban goes through and ALL of Sweeney's tracking accounts go dead. AND Sweeney's personal accounts also go dead. And the Muskbrat says he's going to sue Sweeney. For taking publicly-available information and rebroadcasting it? That should go well.

Too much caffeine, Space Karen?

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/12/musk-bans-live-location-sharing-says-hell-sue-creator-of-plane-tracking-bot/


Last night, some news reporters saw their Twitter accounts go dead. They were from the Washington Post, CNN, and the New York Times. No warning or notice, apparently Elon thinks that posting a link to a different social media platform's ElonJet tracker to Twitter is doxxing him.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/12/musk-suspends-nyt-and-wapo-reporters-from-twitter-claims-they-doxxed-him/


If someone wants to take Elon out and is serious about it, ElonJet is probably not going to be a major tool that they would use.
thewayne: (Default)
Last week, The World's Richest Man, which I guess makes him think that he must also be the world's smartest man, which he clearly isn't based on his behavior, started tweeting smack about Twitter and the amount of spam bots on the site.

There's a problem with this. There is a specific clause in the purchase agreement that he will not disparage the company while trying to purchase it. Something that he has done repeatedly. He already has one shareholder lawsuit against him for manipulating the stock price, plus an FTC investigation against him. The man is a moron, or thinks that his wealth makes him immune to investigations and lawsuits.

Since he announced his intention to buy Twitter, the world economy has taken a bit of a nose-dive, and the stocks of Twitter and Tesla have tanked. Both are worth a lot less. But he has a signed agreement to buy Twitter at $54 per share. A lot of people are wondering if he actually has the backing to conclude the deal at this point, what with the stock price reduction of Tesla, which is one of Elon's major sources of wealth. People are also wondering if he even wants to go through with it at this point, and whether his derision of Twitter is a way of announcing he wants out, hoping THEY will cancel the deal, because of the cancellation clause. If the deal fails to be consummated, the side which fails pays the other a cool $1 billion. That's supposed to be a solid inducement to get the job done, which Twitter's board wants to see.

Elon? Who knows what he wants.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/05/twitter-board-tells-elon-musk-we-will-not-alter-the-deal/
thewayne: (Default)
He claims he's concerned about 5% of the accounts being spam bots, meanwhile it's estimated that of the 53 million followers that musk has, that approximately 53% of those are fake.

Two hours later he tweeted that he's still committed. Part of that was someone probably reminding him that he's on the hook for $1 billion if he terminates the takeover.

Among his claims of what he's going to do with Twitter is to get rid of all bots, which is a pretty big boast as it's something that Twitter has tried to do for ages now. It's a continuing game of whack-a-mole: as soon as you figure out how to close one hole, the bot programmers have three new holes opened. Much like trying to stop spam bots. Very strong incentives for the bad guys to win, i.e., MONEY. Just a couple of days ago Elon announced that he would restore Donald Trump's account, even though Trump himself has said he wouldn't go back on to Twitter and that he'd stay on Truth Social, even though he's made very few posts on it. And of course Trump never goes back on his word, so who knows that he would do. Musk says that Twitter is a town square. No it isn't, it's more like a parlor where people may come and go, but the owner is allowed to kick people out. And if a purple baboon runs in and starts jumping up and down shouting "SNARF! SNARF! SNARF! SNARF!" and annoying people, the owner has the right to kick out the baboon and lock the door on it. Private ownership means private rules.

Meanwhile, both Twitter and Tesla have lost an awful lot of stock valuation in the past few weeks and a lot of people are wondering if Elon has the bucks to seal the deal on Twitter, even after he sold off so much Tesla stock. If either Twitter or Musk cancel the sale, it's $1 billion to the other party, pretty solid incentive to get the deal done. But with this reduced valuation, is there room to renegotiate the price, or is price stuck at the price as negotiated in the deal?

And at Twitter, there's already been a general exodus of tech talent, perhaps a sense of betrayal at the possibility of sale and/or maybe working under Musk? Hard to say. And the CEO has eliminated some executives. Musk himself says he'd fire over 1,000 people in his first year in order to hire 2,000 in the next year. Excellent way to have 50-100% additionally leave based on trashing the corporate culture.

What a mess.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2022/05/musk-says-twitter-deal-on-hold-over-concern-about-number-of-spam-accounts/

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123456 7
8910 11121314
15 1617 18 1920 21
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 22nd, 2025 12:41 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios