richardf8: (Default)
richardf8 ([personal profile] richardf8) wrote in [personal profile] thewayne 2024-08-16 07:38 pm (UTC)

I looked at this. The case for letting it go to trial is strong. The Disney+ ToS should not bind the Estate.

The case itself - I don't know that it's very strong. She believed the server in spite of the lack of Allergen Free flags on the item. The defense is that the kitchen had communicated the danger to the diners and they should have believed that over the server.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org