![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
Just finished Deathly Hallows ***SPOILERS UNDER CUT!***
Very much enjoyed it and have passed it on to the spousal unit.
And just to repeat the warning, SPOILERS UNDER CUT!
I knew Snape was working with Dumbledor, I was rather surprised by the method of his death, though. I thought his final pensive trick was good. I knew he would be redeemed in the end, I kinda like the way they did it.
I also liked the conversion of Kreacher. That was cool. And now we know why Rowling insisted that Kreacher appear in the film of Order of the Phoenix. The death of Dobby was pretty sad, though. I thought it would have been nice to see Bellatrix's knife that killed Dobby used to kill her. Still, Mrs. Weasley got her in fairly spectacular fashion.
Why do I think that Harry is getting a bit of Luna loving on the side? ;-)
I liked the revelation that Dumbledor was mortal and frail like the rest of us. He came off as so perfect, you had to know he had some serious flaws and weaknesses.
I thought the revelation of what happened to his hand in Halfblood Prince was pretty spiff.
Did Harry actually kill anyone directly? I don't think that he did, but I could have easily overlooked it.
One thing bothered me. During the initial escape, Hedwig is killed and Harry loses his broom. Why didn't he summon it back with an Accio? Likewise, when Harry et al were out camping and the other group of refugees come by and start doing "Accio Salmon!", why didn't Harry et al start emulating that?
One thing that I'm curious about is what Rowling is going to do in the future. She doesn't need to do anything, she has more than enough money to not write another word for the rest of her life. I'd like to see other Potterverse stories, they wouldn't have to continue with Harry et al though. But it would be difficult to top what she's written now, anything else could be a severe let-down. I'd definitely like to see what magic is like in other countries, especially in America, but the thing that is constantly reinforced to writers is "write what you know", and Rowling knows the British education and government system, so it could be quite hard for her to write anything else, at least with any verisimilitude.
I was kind of expecting Deathly Hallows to start with a time-gash. Re-reading Halfblood Prince and Order of the Phoenix, and seeing Order of the Phoenix, amply demonstrated that Potter and Crew were not up to a knock-down battle with Deatheaters, so how was Potter supposed to take on Voldy? I thought the "destroy the horcruxes" quest as a great way to sidestep that issue.
I hope they make the final movie three hours long. I'd say there's a good chance of it. I think the movie is going to be pretty spectacular, especially the final battle and the break-in at and escape from Gringot's.
And just to repeat the warning, SPOILERS UNDER CUT!
I knew Snape was working with Dumbledor, I was rather surprised by the method of his death, though. I thought his final pensive trick was good. I knew he would be redeemed in the end, I kinda like the way they did it.
I also liked the conversion of Kreacher. That was cool. And now we know why Rowling insisted that Kreacher appear in the film of Order of the Phoenix. The death of Dobby was pretty sad, though. I thought it would have been nice to see Bellatrix's knife that killed Dobby used to kill her. Still, Mrs. Weasley got her in fairly spectacular fashion.
Why do I think that Harry is getting a bit of Luna loving on the side? ;-)
I liked the revelation that Dumbledor was mortal and frail like the rest of us. He came off as so perfect, you had to know he had some serious flaws and weaknesses.
I thought the revelation of what happened to his hand in Halfblood Prince was pretty spiff.
Did Harry actually kill anyone directly? I don't think that he did, but I could have easily overlooked it.
One thing bothered me. During the initial escape, Hedwig is killed and Harry loses his broom. Why didn't he summon it back with an Accio? Likewise, when Harry et al were out camping and the other group of refugees come by and start doing "Accio Salmon!", why didn't Harry et al start emulating that?
One thing that I'm curious about is what Rowling is going to do in the future. She doesn't need to do anything, she has more than enough money to not write another word for the rest of her life. I'd like to see other Potterverse stories, they wouldn't have to continue with Harry et al though. But it would be difficult to top what she's written now, anything else could be a severe let-down. I'd definitely like to see what magic is like in other countries, especially in America, but the thing that is constantly reinforced to writers is "write what you know", and Rowling knows the British education and government system, so it could be quite hard for her to write anything else, at least with any verisimilitude.
I was kind of expecting Deathly Hallows to start with a time-gash. Re-reading Halfblood Prince and Order of the Phoenix, and seeing Order of the Phoenix, amply demonstrated that Potter and Crew were not up to a knock-down battle with Deatheaters, so how was Potter supposed to take on Voldy? I thought the "destroy the horcruxes" quest as a great way to sidestep that issue.
I hope they make the final movie three hours long. I'd say there's a good chance of it. I think the movie is going to be pretty spectacular, especially the final battle and the break-in at and escape from Gringot's.
no subject
The thing about the death of Snape was that it was so casual. Nothing dramatic, just *poof!* and dead. Not to say that it was a dishonorable death, but it was far from an honorable one.
I'm really looking forward to Russet finishing the book!
no subject
*nods* Yeah that's very true. It wasn't honorable nor dishonorable just...there. I think everyone was "bwah!?" when it happened.
Sweet! Let me know what she thinks!
no subject