Doonesbury Say What
Jan. 11th, 2026 02:52 pm"No one wants to go in there when a random f***ing tweet can change the entire foreign policy of the country."
-- oil industry investor, about Venezuela
I was reading a quote from an Exxon exec, talking about how all of Exxon's assets had been nationalized by Venezuela TWICE. Yeah, not a place where oil companies are going to be eager to rush back in to rebuild their infrastructure.
Not going to bother talking about a certain person's habit of changing international policy via social media posts, waste of finger and mental energy.
-- oil industry investor, about Venezuela
I was reading a quote from an Exxon exec, talking about how all of Exxon's assets had been nationalized by Venezuela TWICE. Yeah, not a place where oil companies are going to be eager to rush back in to rebuild their infrastructure.
Not going to bother talking about a certain person's habit of changing international policy via social media posts, waste of finger and mental energy.
no subject
Date: 2026-01-11 10:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2026-01-12 01:05 am (UTC)Hugs, Jon
no subject
Date: 2026-01-12 02:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2026-01-12 04:18 am (UTC)Venezuela has the Orinico Belt, which is not generally speaking the good stuff; there's a lot of it, but it's frequently tar. The good stuff is in Guyana, offshore. Which production is rapidly expanding, mostly profiting Exxon, and subject to a territorial dispute with Venezula.
Much of these events make sense as a thing the US petrofaction wants to happen if you look at it as a tripartite "there's no territorial dispute if there's no Venezula/Guyana will get the message about wanting a larger share of the profits or control just fine/let's take out the Russian regional ally, shall we?" action. (Russia is perhaps still capable of providing political cover for nationalization; the current on-the-ground outcome is that Russia's influence has been shown to be strictly hypothetical, since the region is in range of direct American power projection from CONUS.)
tl;dr it's protecting the investment offshore in Guyana, which the oil companies do want to make, without getting that investment/extraction into the news. (I mean, officially, this is all about drugs. Any oil theft from Venezuela will exist as reparations for claims of drug damage.)
no subject
Date: 2026-01-12 04:24 am (UTC)No, he's never demonstrated great business acumen. He licenses his name on everything and plays golf.
no subject
Date: 2026-01-12 04:26 am (UTC)Interesting info, thanks. I knew a little about the Guyana resources, but not a lot.
no subject
Date: 2026-01-12 04:02 pm (UTC)