thewayne: (Default)
[personal profile] thewayne
"No one wants to go in there when a random f***ing tweet can change the entire foreign policy of the country."
-- oil industry investor, about Venezuela

I was reading a quote from an Exxon exec, talking about how all of Exxon's assets had been nationalized by Venezuela TWICE. Yeah, not a place where oil companies are going to be eager to rush back in to rebuild their infrastructure.

Not going to bother talking about a certain person's habit of changing international policy via social media posts, waste of finger and mental energy.

Date: 2026-01-11 10:18 pm (UTC)
dewline: Text - "On the DEWLine" (Default)
From: [personal profile] dewline
So there's some people in the fossil fuel business who do have something resembling good sense. Grateful for that, as far as it goes.

Date: 2026-01-12 01:05 am (UTC)
disneydream06: (Disney Shocked)
From: [personal profile] disneydream06
UGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hugs, Jon

Date: 2026-01-12 02:38 am (UTC)
white_aster: (Default)
From: [personal profile] white_aster
Just goes to show a certain person knows absolutely nothing about real business. The difference between real business acumen and somebody just gambling.

Date: 2026-01-12 04:18 am (UTC)
graydon: (Default)
From: [personal profile] graydon

Venezuela has the Orinico Belt, which is not generally speaking the good stuff; there's a lot of it, but it's frequently tar. The good stuff is in Guyana, offshore. Which production is rapidly expanding, mostly profiting Exxon, and subject to a territorial dispute with Venezula.

Much of these events make sense as a thing the US petrofaction wants to happen if you look at it as a tripartite "there's no territorial dispute if there's no Venezula/Guyana will get the message about wanting a larger share of the profits or control just fine/let's take out the Russian regional ally, shall we?" action. (Russia is perhaps still capable of providing political cover for nationalization; the current on-the-ground outcome is that Russia's influence has been shown to be strictly hypothetical, since the region is in range of direct American power projection from CONUS.)

tl;dr it's protecting the investment offshore in Guyana, which the oil companies do want to make, without getting that investment/extraction into the news. (I mean, officially, this is all about drugs. Any oil theft from Venezuela will exist as reparations for claims of drug damage.)

Date: 2026-01-12 04:02 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] ionelv
Despite the general chaos generated almost daily from two thumbs at Mar-a-Lago, oil execs MIGHT invest in Venezuela if any incentives are there, e.g. big orange stick, tax payer funded capital outlays, secret written future promises of military intervention if needed, Epstein/Russian blackmail shit, etc. Don't count US oil investment in Venezuela out just yet.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45 6 7 89 10
11 121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 12th, 2026 11:05 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios