thewayne: (Default)
[personal profile] thewayne
I thought this oddly congruent with the current stink over iPhone/Android location data collection.

The story, interestingly enough, isn't about computers: it's about pharmacy records. In Vermont, patient pharmacy records are, of course, confidential. Doctor's pharmacy prescription orders are not. So pharmacies have been selling the data to aggregators who sell it back to drug reps and companies, who can then target doctors who prescribe lots of generics, stuff like that.

The patient side of the data is anonymized, but apparently you can still track patient drug use, you just can't tie it to a patient.

The Vermont doctor's did not like this, so they got a law passed banning said aggregation. The aggregators appealed and got it overturned, Vermont appealed it to the Supreme Court.

The issue being debated is actually free speech, and it has a couple of interesting twists that I can't really do justice to relating it here, so read the fine article if you're interested.

http://www.npr.org/2011/04/26/135703500/supreme-court-weighs-whether-to-limit-data-mining
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 5th, 2026 07:56 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios