Uh, no?

Dec. 29th, 2011 01:43 pm
thewayne: (Default)
[personal profile] thewayne
"Every barrel of oil that comes out of those sands in Canada is a barrel of oil that we don't have to buy from a foreign source."
— Gov. Rick Perry

"Sand oil" is called that because it comes from a special type of sand and requires a lot of additional processing before it gets to the crude state, where the normal refining process can begin. It ain't a 1:1 replacement. I especially love the number of jobs that Republicans are claiming the pipeline will create. I guess a candidate's true job is to tell the people what they want to hear, who cares if it's accurate. Wikipedia has a good description: Making liquid fuels from oil sands requires energy for steam injection and refining. This process generates two to four times the amount of greenhouse gases per barrel of final product as the "production" of conventional oil.[3] If combustion of the final products is included, the so-called "Well to Wheels" approach, oil sands extraction, upgrade and use emits 10 to 45% more greenhouse gases than conventional crude.[4] They actually describe the extraction process as mining, not drilling/pumping. So the only thing that might make it cheaper than OPEC oil is lower transport costs.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

March 2026

S M T W T F S
1 234567
89 1011 121314
1516 17 18 192021
2223 2425262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 26th, 2026 03:52 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios