thewayne: (Default)
[personal profile] thewayne
The New York State Attorney General is investigating that the practice of MSG is discriminatory, especially with the notorious false rate of positives vs minorities and women.

MSG replies 'Nuh uh.' Their main rebuttle is that such a small class of people are affected, i.e. a very small subset of attorneys.

What I'm curious about is we all recognize the 'We may refuse service to pretty much anyone if we want' right of businesses to ban people. But that's usually for specific behavior: theft, starting a fight, etc. The use of facial recognition by MSG - as reported - is blocking people whom MSG management has simply said 'we don't like these people' - even though they still sell them the ticket, they just won't let them in the door. It's not much different from an Alabama diner in the '50s with a sign that says 'No Coloreds', just a different type of class - attorneys that are not directly involved in litigation vs MSG as opposed to skin tone.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/01/msg-probed-over-use-of-facial-recognition-to-eject-lawyers-from-show-venues/

Date: 2023-01-29 10:50 pm (UTC)
kaishin108: waves by hwm (Default)
From: [personal profile] kaishin108
That is awful about who ends up training for the facial recognition.

Yes the AI does seem like a fun toy. I have a few other friends here who play with it but then my imagination goes to the future and what it could do.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123456 7
8910 11121314
15 1617 18 1920 21
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 01:24 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios