"Microsoft's cloudy platform, Windows Azure, is experiencing a major outage: at the time of writing, its service management system had been down for about seven hours worldwide. A customer described the problem to The Register as an 'admin nightmare' and said they couldn't understand how such an important system could go down. 'This should never happen,' said our source. 'The system should be redundant and outages should be confined to some data centres only.'"
The Azure service dashboard has regular updates on the situation. According to their update feed the situation should have been resolved a few hours ago but has instead gotten worse: "We continue to work through the issues that are blocking the restoration of service management for some customers in North Central US, South Central US and North Europe sub-regions. Further updates will be published to keep you apprised of the situation. We apologize for any inconvenience this causes our customers." To be fair, other cloud providers have had similar issues before.
I honestly am not picking on Microsoft for this. You could just as easily strike Microsoft's Azure from the subject and it would still stand. If you put all of your data in a cloud, you run a high risk of that data being unavailable at some point or another, and invariably it will be just when you need it. You also run a risk of a cloud provider going away and you losing everything. And if you think you can provide redundancy by pushing data to two different cloud providers at the same time, forget it. They use different API's and interfaces, it's extremely difficult.
http://slashdot.org/story/12/02/29/153226/microsofts-azure-cloud-suffers-major-downtime
Yesterday, Harris Corp. announced that it was exiting the Cloud business. Two years ago they built a $200m data center in Virginia to provide cloud hosting for the Feds, 'It's becoming clear that customers, both government and commercial, currently have a preference for on-premise versus off-premise solutions,' said Harris' CEO."
http://it.slashdot.org/story/12/02/28/1559255/harris-exits-cloud-hosting-citing-fed-server-hugging
The Azure service dashboard has regular updates on the situation. According to their update feed the situation should have been resolved a few hours ago but has instead gotten worse: "We continue to work through the issues that are blocking the restoration of service management for some customers in North Central US, South Central US and North Europe sub-regions. Further updates will be published to keep you apprised of the situation. We apologize for any inconvenience this causes our customers." To be fair, other cloud providers have had similar issues before.
I honestly am not picking on Microsoft for this. You could just as easily strike Microsoft's Azure from the subject and it would still stand. If you put all of your data in a cloud, you run a high risk of that data being unavailable at some point or another, and invariably it will be just when you need it. You also run a risk of a cloud provider going away and you losing everything. And if you think you can provide redundancy by pushing data to two different cloud providers at the same time, forget it. They use different API's and interfaces, it's extremely difficult.
http://slashdot.org/story/12/02/29/153226/microsofts-azure-cloud-suffers-major-downtime
Yesterday, Harris Corp. announced that it was exiting the Cloud business. Two years ago they built a $200m data center in Virginia to provide cloud hosting for the Feds, 'It's becoming clear that customers, both government and commercial, currently have a preference for on-premise versus off-premise solutions,' said Harris' CEO."
http://it.slashdot.org/story/12/02/28/1559255/harris-exits-cloud-hosting-citing-fed-server-hugging