Jan. 18th, 2022

thewayne: (Default)
This is an old story from last November, I've been slow cleaning up some tabs. Relevant nonetheless. The first paragraph really says it all.

It’s been less than a year since Vizio became a publicly traded company, and one consequence of that is we know more about its business than ever before. The TV maker released its latest earnings report on Tuesday and revealed that over the last three months, its Platform Plus segment that includes advertising and viewer data had a gross profit of $57.3 million. That’s more than twice the amount of profit it made selling devices like TVs, which was $25.6 million, despite those device sales pulling in considerably more revenue.

Now, that's not the only problem with these devices. I believe it was Samsung that rendered useless an entire segment of smart TVs a year or two ago from simply not updating their software. They moved on from that generation of software and let it whither and die and lose all functionality.

The solution? There's two. Well, there's a third and that's to simply let it be if you don't care. If you like your TV being smart and have some tech savvieness, get yourself a RaspberryPi and set up a PiHole. You can trap the ads going to the TV and the telemetry going back to the vendor. That might impair functionality. The simple solution is to ignore the smart TV's functionality and never connect it to WiFi: plug in an Amazon Fire Stick, Google Chromecast, Roku device, or Apple TV device. Or a Play Station or similar gaming console. Use them for your streaming. It's guaranteed that your streaming sites are going to get your data, people like NetFlix or Disney, and you know they're going to monetize it, but why should the TV vendor? Apple has a good privacy policy, and while they're going to monitor your use patterns to see how you use their device, they've never sold information.

Now, keep in mind Vizio is not unique in this: all smart TV makers do this, this is just a nice blatant demonstration of how much your consumer information is worth to them and how much it scales. Next year it will easily be 3:1 instead of 2:1 because those TVs sold last year will still be generating revenue, albeit at a slower pace as some are replaced with non-Vizio TVs. And Google is just as bad at monetizing off your data: when they announced their corporate motto as "Don't be evil", what they meant was "Don't get caught being evil." They monetize the hell out of data through keyword searches of your email and our Google Searches through selling adverts that are vaguely accurate.

Remember: when you're not paying for a service online, YOU are the thing being itemized and being profited from. And that's why Facebook, Google and Amazon are so desperate to track you across everything you do online. All of those behavioral analytics are worth a fortune to them when applied internally to sell you shit or when packaged and sold to advertisers. Facebook can literally sell ad impressions to "30-35 year old stay at home moms in Des Moine who drink wine and lean Conservative". No problem. All through tracked analytics. Easy peasy. And tracking TV viewing is one such method, as is Facebook analytics.

Personally, when I buy a TV I look for the dumb ones. Less stuff to go wrong in the TV and the remotes. It also saves money. If I were ever given a smart one, it would never get connected to my home network. I'd just plug in my Apple TV via HDMI, just like nothing had changed.

https://www.theverge.com/2021/11/10/22773073/vizio-acr-advertising-inscape-data-privacy-q3-2021
thewayne: (Default)
Oh wow. I remember Al on Doctor Demento back in the '70s (yes, I am a fossil) and his early records. I saw Weird Al live once in Mesa in the '80s, can't remember what album was current at the time, not that it matters. But I will say this: I think this will be a wild ride! I may actually subscribe to Roku for a month to watch this when it comes out!

To quote Weird Al from the article:
“When my last movie UHF came out in 1989, I made a solemn vow to my fans that I would release a major motion picture every 33 years, like clockwork. I’m very happy to say we’re on schedule,” Yankovic added in a statement. “And I am absolutely thrilled that Daniel Radcliffe will be portraying me in the film. I have no doubt whatsoever that this is the role future generations will remember him for.”

This is a trailer embedded in the article. I have no idea whether to take it seriously.


https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/daniel-radcliffe-weird-al-yankovic-biopic-1286492

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
1112 131415 1617
18 19 20 212223 24
25262728 2930 31

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 1st, 2025 05:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios