thewayne: (Default)
[personal profile] thewayne
The new (post 9/11) no-fly lists used by the airlines have been hugely expanded. The only problem is that they only list a person's name. No other identifying data. Because of this expansion, one year old babies are being tagged as suspicious.

Sigh.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050815/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/no_fly_babies

Date: 2005-08-16 02:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] apostate-96.livejournal.com
Jesus Christ.... What next, denial of pregnant women because they might NAME their kid something that'd match the list? It's also scary how much that indicates the people in airline security aren't fucking THINKING...

Date: 2005-08-16 10:56 am (UTC)
deborak: (indulge me)
From: [personal profile] deborak
Hey, an unintended good consequence! Keeping squalling babies off planes! ;-P

February 2026

S M T W T F S
12 3 45 6 7
8910 11 121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 17th, 2026 01:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios