thewayne: (Default)
[personal profile] thewayne
Gee, it seems like it was only two days ago that this bit of ugliness reared its head.

Oh, wait. It was two days ago.

Motorola claims that the post was, indeed, FUD. They say "If a device attempts to boot with unapproved software, it will go into recovery mode, and can re-boot once approved software is re-installed. ."

This seems reasonable to me. It will make it almost impossible to install custom chips into the phone, which isn't a problem for most users. But according to Big M, it won't permanently brick the phone.

I'm sure we'll see a lot of hacker reports as soon as this phone is in broad distribution trying to independently prove these assertions one way or another.

http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/16/motorola-responds-to-droid-x-bootloader-controversy-says-efuse/

http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/10/07/17/037259/Motorola-Says-eFuse-Doesnt-Permanently-Brick-Phones

Date: 2010-07-17 06:02 pm (UTC)
silveradept: A kodama with a trombone. The trombone is playing music, even though it is held in a rest position (Default)
From: [personal profile] silveradept
Hrm. I have no doubt someone will be able to fake-sign their stuff so that the Motorola phones recognize it as genuine and let it through. Why not let those who want to hack, hack?

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 2nd, 2026 08:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios