thewayne: (Cyranose)
[personal profile] thewayne
YES! And a unanimous ruling! It's always been understood that things in nature cannot be patented, I don't know why the patent office didn't reject applications like this from the beginning. But it's well-known that the U.S. patent office is underfunded and understaffed and unable to keep up with the rapid rate of change in new tech fields.

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/13/06/13/1550225/supreme-court-no-patents-for-natural-dna-sequences

Date: 2013-06-13 11:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] moiraj.livejournal.com
I'm so relieved. I thought it was insane that the idea of patenting DNA got anywhere in the first place.

At one of the court houses I worked in, the staff had given up trying to tell people - usually the unrepresented - that they couldn't file this or that. The hassle was too much and they just let the judge handle it. Unfortunately, that often resulted in the other side having to pay legal fees to fight the stuff that shouldn't have been filed.

Date: 2013-06-14 12:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thewayne.livejournal.com
Sort of the classic 'you can sue anyone for anything' regardless of the merits. I occasionally get emails from my dad and others about 'this guy is suing Obama because he knows the truth, and Obama is shutting him down!', while they ignore the fact that the guy basically has no life and spends his life filing frivolous lawsuits and representing himself.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 2nd, 2026 04:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios