thewayne: (Cyranose)
[personal profile] thewayne
For less than $4,000 you can get an absolutely crazy amount of megapixels, and still have less dynamic range than a Nikon D800.

This doesn't make sense to me. I'd be perfectly happy with 20-30 MP and increased dynamic range. It'll be interesting to see how these work out in the field, and how it steers the market.

http://www.wired.com/2015/02/canon-blasts-50-megapixel-full-frame-dslr-brand-new-flagship-rebels/

Date: 2015-02-09 01:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] artkouros.livejournal.com
If it's not infinity pixels I'm not interested.

Date: 2015-02-10 01:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thewayne.livejournal.com
The highest pixel count that I've heard of, short of a satellite, was a guy who strapped a USB-powered flatbed scanner to the back of a 8x10 view camera. My understanding was that it produced over 200 MP B&W but it took some 5-10 seconds per exposure for the scan bar to move across the platen.

I really want to do this some day.

Though considering some of the cameras that they've developed that theoretically allow you to recompose the shot after exposure, that's pretty close to infinity.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 2nd, 2026 06:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios