thewayne: (Default)
The RNC filed a lawsuit against Google for Gmail sending RNC fundraising mail addressed to Gmail users directly to spam folders, saying that they had an anti-conservative bias. Of seven claims they made, the judge thoroughly squashed five of them, and is letting the RNC amend two. However, the basic underpinnings of the two claims were knocked away and they'll have to be significantly readdressed to be refiled.

Here is perhaps my favorite utterance from the judge. The RNC claimed that Google committed fraud, I guess for failing to deliver the solicitation mail to the mailing list inboxes? The judge said: "The RNC lacks standing to bring the fraud claim because it is not a Gmail user, ... The RNC uses Salesforce and a separate email-delivery platform called Everest."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Plus, Gmail is a free service! How could Google defraud me if I'm not a business-class customer paying for it? Yes, they do have a business tier.

Why do I have a sneaking suspicion that Google might buy a business-class subscription and start spraying their Google email address base direct that way?

Oh, and here's another beauty of a quote: Google previously ran a pilot program that let political emails bypass the Gmail spam filter. Google said in a January 2023 court filing that "the RNC has chosen not to participate in Google's FEC-approved Pilot Program."

And here's a comment for the article from a mail server administrator: "Speaking as a mailserver admin: more GOP fundraiser emails wind up in the spamtrap because the GOP uses more spammer tactics, more aggressively. I've seen everything from spoofed to and from lines to entire messages in the subject line to white text on white background to bayes poison to substituting letters for numbers to try to evade money-related spam filters to you name it.

A brand new install of spamassassin with default filters only will also block far more Republican fundraiser emails than DNC ones, for exactly this reason... And the disparity only gets worse if you let it train its Bayes filter (which, quick reminder, the GOP sometimes attempts to poison)."


https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/08/judge-tears-apart-republican-lawsuit-alleging-bias-in-gmail-spam-filter/
thewayne: (Cyranose)
PGP stands for Pretty Good Privacy, a VERY strong crypto system that gives excellent end-to-end encryption for email users. It has been released to security researchers to poke at it to find flaws, it's not yet available to the general public but will be in the form of browser add-ins.

On the plus side: industry-standard and publicly-examined crypto. This should do an excellent job of preventing anyone from reading your email except for the intended recipient. On the down side: it can be slightly clunky to use, though the Gmail integration should make key exchanges more smooth.

In brief, this is how PGP works. The software generates a gobsmackingly-huge prime number and creates two crypto keys, a public one and a private one. You don't need to be concerned about the content of the key because it's just a huge hexadecimal mess. Let's say that you and I want to exchange email, and we've both implemented PGP. Let's call my private key A1 and my public key A2, your private key is Z1 and your public key is Z2. We give our public keys to anyone with whom we want to exchange email, but we jealously guard our private keys. When I want to send you an email, the message is encrypted on my end using A1+Z2, you decrypt it using Z1+A2. At a basic level, that's all there is to it. The software handles combining the keys and encrypting or decrypting the message, it also handles key exchanges. The thing that you have to watch out for is if you ever lose your private key, you have to notify everyone that your key was compromised, your friends delete your public key from their systems, and then you generate a new pair of keys and redistribute your public key.

Which brings up a third negative: you can't use email on a public computer without importing your key in to that system, with potential security risks if that computer has already been compromised. A lot of people store their keys on USB drives which they try to never let out of their personal control. Another negative is that if you're sending big attachments in email, it can take some time for big files to have the crypto applied/removed.

Google is doing a definitely good thing here, opening up the code to the public for review by experts, and at some cost to them: they cannot read the encrypted messages, so they can't do keyword searches and targeted advertising.

http://www.wired.com/2014/06/end-to-end/

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2345
67891011 12
13 1415 1617 18 19
2021 22 23242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 25th, 2025 06:47 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios