thewayne: (Default)
I completed the New York Times Monday crossword - by myself! 18 and a half minutes!

Russet has been doing it for ages, and I would help her out occasionally on music and some other older pop culture references. When we were doing long-distance driving at night, I'd load up the puzzle on my iPad and we'd thrash it out while driving - she driving, me working the iPad.

About three months ago we started doing it together every night. When she worked, I'd call her and we'd do it over the phone. She liked the higher difficulty level of not being able to see it, though last week there was a tough one and I'd pause it, she'd pick it up, and eventually we thrashed it. Last night's was interesting: there were eight "locks" - the theme was safe-cracking, and each lock would rotate, and the four letters it contained would change the words as it rotated! It was pretty cool.

Tonight I was infusing and she decided it was nap time for her, after my infusion was over I grabbed my laptop and went to it. Now, granted, Monday is the easiest of the week's puzzles as they increase in difficulty with the weekend being the most challenging, but I was still pleased with completing it entirely on my own, and in a fairly good time as the two of us together usually take 15-20 minutes on early week puzzles.

Her specialty is jigsaw puzzles. She has competed in tournaments and will flip a completed puzzle over and do the blank back! Have I mentioned that she's just a teensy-bit insane?
thewayne: (Default)
Interesting times!

The suit contends that ChatGPT did not have permission to do a deep scan of the NYT's article database to train their system, and in doing so violated the NYT's terms of service.

From the Ars article (an Arsicle?): "Weeks after The New York Times updated its terms of service (TOS) to prohibit AI companies from scraping its articles and images to train AI models, it appears that the Times may be preparing to sue OpenAI. The result, experts speculate, could be devastating to OpenAI, including the destruction of ChatGPT's dataset and fines up to $150,000 per infringing piece of content."

and "This speculation comes a month after Sarah Silverman joined other popular authors suing OpenAI over similar concerns, seeking to protect the copyright of their books.

But here's the biggie: "NPR reported that OpenAI risks a federal judge ordering ChatGPT's entire data set to be completely rebuilt—if the Times successfully proves the company copied its content illegally and the court restricts OpenAI training models to only include explicitly authorized data. OpenAI could face huge fines for each piece of infringing content, dealing OpenAI a massive financial blow just months after The Washington Post reported that ChatGPT has begun shedding users, "shaking faith in AI revolution." Beyond that, a legal victory could trigger an avalanche of similar claims from other rights holders.

Unlike authors who appear most concerned about retaining the option to remove their books from OpenAI's training models, the Times has other concerns about AI tools like ChatGPT. NPR reported that a "top concern" is that ChatGPT could use The Times' content to become a "competitor" by "creating text that answers questions based on the original reporting and writing of the paper's staff."


Fair Use is quite an issue. I quote news sites all the time, just like the excerpts above. I make no claim it is my content, it is clearly delineated as to what is quoted from the article and what is my commentary or additional content. And I am in no way making any money from this. Things are a little different when you have AI/LLM systems hoovering up all the content that they can find to train up. Those system makers want to spend the least amount of money possible to train their systems because their energy costs are absolutely huge! I posted an article a month or so ago about a new supercomputer that will be running an AI system that consumed as much power as either 3,000 or 30,000 houses, I saw both numbers. If these guys can get training data for free, they'll go for it. But authors are pushing back: if people have to buy their books to read it (excluding libraries where people can borrow for free), then why should AI companies get a free read?

If an art generating AI wants to use my photos, I would like to be compensated! If you want to use one of my photos for a desktop wallpaper or screen saver, I'm honored. If you sell my photos for profit - then we have an issue! I've spent over four decades developing my craft and I'm pretty decent at it, I'd like some acknowledgement and compensation for it and not for it to be stolen for an AI system's use, as they've been doing.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/08/report-potential-nyt-lawsuit-could-force-openai-to-wipe-chatgpt-and-start-over/
thewayne: (Default)
Written by a psych professor who talks about Obama as a leader being unable to tell compelling stories with clear villains, among other things. He talks about essentially Obama allowing himself to be bullied by the RNC and others instead of standing up to them, and in the process, really surrendering the power of his office. I found it interesting and more than a little sad, I don't think he is what we needed, which is not to say that I think McCain/Palin was a better choice.

The prof was on Talk of the Nation a couple of days ago.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/07/opinion/sunday/what-happened-to-obamas-passion.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print
thewayne: (Default)
"As of Wednesday, Wall Street valued Apple at $222.12 billion and Microsoft at $219.18 billion. The only American company valued higher is Exxon Mobil, with a market capitalization of $278.64 billion."

Probably pushed over the top by the iPad sales, they're apparently moving 200,000 units a week. It'll be interesting to see if this continues. It's also going to be quite interesting by the end of the year when Google Android slate machines start hitting the street.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/27/technology/27apple.html?hp=&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1275235226-YDtql5rarhbl1HwLc4cV8A

http://apple.slashdot.org/story/10/05/26/228232/Apple-Surpasses-Microsoft-In-Market-Capitalization?art_pos=13
thewayne: (Default)
Interesting. I hadn't heard about this, but you can write programs that directly interface with NYT's and NPR's databases. In fact, a programmer from Phoenix has written a timeline program for the NPR API that's kind of interesting, you can play with it here.

http://www.webmonkey.com/blog/New_York_Times__Derek_Gottfrid_and_NPR_s_Dan_Jacobson_Discuss_APIs

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123456 7
8910 11121314
15 161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 18th, 2025 04:01 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios