thewayne: (Default)
This is quite interesting. The international standard, Le Grande K, stored in France, has been changing. It's suspected that outgassing is to blame, so they're working on a new standard. The interesting part is the constant 'develop a new/better way of doing things, find something that you didn't expect that you now have to take in to account.'

They're trying to make a silicon sphere that would become the new international definition, but they're having production problems. They brought in a lens grinder who built a ball with such precision that if it were the size of the earth, reportedly, the difference between the tallest mountain and deepest ocean would be four meters. And it still isn't good enough. Plus, the guy has retired and has no apprentices as good as him, but they think that new tech will make a better sandblaster that will help production.

http://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/09/ff_kilogram/all/1
thewayne: (Default)
Well, sorta. Time-lapse films of two observatories showing some gorgeous skies and really neat telescope movement.

Australia:


Chile:


http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2011-05/time-lapse-video-very-large-telescope-work-coolest-thing-youll-see-today
thewayne: (Default)
Apparently so. From the article: "Conventional paper is made from cellulose, a crystalline polymer of glucose that's the primary component of plant cell walls. At the nanoscale level, cellulose can be extremely strong, with individual fibers capable of withstanding more stress than glass fibers or steel wire. But paper processing generates relatively large cellulose microfibers riddled with defects that can break apart under stress. That leaves most commercial paper with a tensile strength that tops out at about 30 megapascals (MPa)" Apparently by using nanotube technology and some cool chemistry, the paper can be made to over 200 MPa, steel has a strength of 130 MPa.

http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2008/609/1?

http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/06/10/0033201
thewayne: (Default)
I thought it was cool that Brian May finally completed his PhD, and conveniently, User Friendly talks about it today!

http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20070803
thewayne: (Default)
One of the telescopes at the observatory where my wife works is the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. (wiki entry) It has collected a HUGE amount of data in the years that it has been operating, and they've started a "@home" project to help identify characteristics of galaxies.

"They are asking volunteers on the Internet to help classify the galaxies as either elliptical or spiral and note, where possible, in which direction they rotate."

You go through a tutorial to train you to help identify galaxy characteristics and what direction it is rotating, then you go off identifying from photos. Lots of other people are doing the same thing on the same images that you're looking at, so it's a preponderance of votes that gets the galaxy classified, this also dampens the effect of someone going in and classifying everything as counterclockwise to try and throw everything off.

Anyway, I thought that there's enough science geeks who read my blog that might find this interesting to do.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/space/07/12/galaxy.internet.ap/index.html
thewayne: (Default)
This is a very cool project. If I won a lottery I'd gladly give them money for this!

For most of the history of astronomy from when photography came around up to and including today, glass plates and film have been used to record observations. Pluto was discovered by using a device called a blink comparator where you mount two glass plates taken of the same star field a few months (or years) apart, look through one eyepiece, and press a button. Every time you press it, it flips a mirror between the plates. If you see any movemement, it might be a planet. Black & white photography is a great way to do this: you develop the film, and the bright things that you shot are black, so it's quite easy to see what represents stars and what is just empty space.

(the blink comparator, the Pluto plates, and the telescope used by Clyde Tombaugh are on display at the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, AZ)

This project is especially cool because it includes sky surveys from both the northern and southern hemispheres for over a century!

The collection weighs 165 TONS and contains more than a petabyte of data (a petabyte is the next increment above terabyte which is the increment above gigabyte). And it's an original with no backups. I hope they get fundage soon!

http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/07/11/217218 It's really amazing how they're going about doing this, I would love to see the camera and software that they're using! And I think Russet worked at the observatory mentioned in the article, but I'm not sure.

(try http:/www.bugmenot.com for an already registered free NYT login)
thewayne: (Default)
Very interesting. They lit a bulb from 2 meters away through transmitted power with 40% efficiency using theories based on resonance.

Hooray for MIT boffins!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/6725955.stm
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2007/wireless-0607.html
http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/06/07/2057236
thewayne: (Default)
There is a type of telescope called an LMT -- Liquid Mirror Telescope. It has a giant dish with a reflective fluid, mercury has been used in the past, that rotates. The motion causes the liquid to form a parabola, thus you have a telescope mirror. There's all sorts of technical problems regarding smoothness of motion, lack of vibration, etc, but it works. The biggest hitch is that it can pretty much only point in one direction -- straight up.

Well, a scientist at University of Arizona is proposing building a 100 meter LMT on the moon! No atmospheric interference, low gravity simplifies all sorts of things. Of course, your shipping costs are kinda steep. The proposal is to make two prototypes on the moon, scaling up to the 100 meter model.

I think this would be tremendously cool if it ever gets built, but I'm not holding my breath.

I've read about this before as there is/was a LMT installation about three miles from Cloudcroft. It was used by NASA to catalog orbital debris and was de-commissioned and the telescope shipped off to other parts, theoretically the facility has been re-opened and houses a new spiffy one-meter, but I haven't seen it yet.

http://www.wired.com/science/space/news/2007/05/liquid_telescope

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    1 23
45678910
1112 1314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 16th, 2025 02:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios