Feb. 25th, 2024

thewayne: (Default)
First up, the Varda orbital drug lab finally secured a re-entry permit and landed in Utah!

This is a curious thing. Varda makes pharmaceuticals. Okay, cool. Lots of drugs start their lives out as powders. Okay. Powders are, at their basic level, derived from crystals. Now's the cool part: crystals grow differently in microgravity than they do in full gravity on the Earth's surface. Varda secured funding to build this self-contained orbital crystal-growing facility and got it launched into space, where they grew crystals!

Nice!

It went into orbit on June 12 of '22. It was supposed to be in orbit for a month. And therein is the tale.

I am unclear what happened, but the FAA denied them a permit to "application for a commercial reentry license", and then the U.S. Air Force denied them permission to land at their facility. So this capsule has been humming along over our heads for an additional 6+ months, hopefully generating more crystals. Alternative landing sites in Australia and elsewhere were explored, but nothing became of it, I think the USA was exerting some sort of eminent domain authority since it was an American company. Eventually the reentry was authorized and the capsule landed in Utah and was recovered, it's now on its way to L.A. to see what new configurations the crystals achieved.

https://techcrunch.com/2024/02/21/varda-space-rocket-lab-nail-first-of-its-kind-spacecraft-landing-in-utah/

https://science.slashdot.org/story/24/02/22/1545243/varda-space-rocket-lab-nail-first-of-its-kind-spacecraft-landing-in-utah


Next up, an American unmanned lander touched down on the moon for the first time in 50 years, and it landed mostly intact!

The lander, Odysseus, is from a private company - an absolute first! All other lunar landers have been government projects. This one received a lot of gov't money, it's part of a NASA program to encourage private industry investment in space projects. The lander carries six scientific payloads and was launched last week on a SpaceX Falcon 9. It landed about 180 miles from the Lunar South Pole.

The location is important for three big reasons. First, it's likely to be a future landing site for manned missions because (2) there's a crater there whose rim is in sunlight like 80% of the lunar month. That makes for much more desirable conditions to live in. And (3), conversely the crater itself appears to have frozen ice, possibly on the order of two miles deep! That's a lot of frozen water! Now, we have no idea what the contaminant situation is, so you can't just go out with an ice pick and chip off some pieces and plop it in your drink.

The lander has one big problem, though: it fell over. The second lander in recent history to do so. Communications was lost in its final landing stage, and while the autonomous landing system worked remarkably well, you just can't beat an experienced pilot behind the controls. It appears that it probably clipped a boulder with one of its landing legs and fell over. The issue is that the communications mast is now lying in the lunar regolith rather than pointing straight up, so its signal is pretty weak. There's also a question as to whether this will impair the ability of the experiments to deploy.

Time will tell. And time is limited because the approaching lunar night is at -250 degrees Celsius, which will freeze the lander and that will be the end of that. I think they have something on the order of eight days to get everything done.

The Yahoo article has some nice photos of the launch.

https://arstechnica.com/space/2024/02/a-little-us-company-makes-history-by-landing-on-the-moon-but-questions-remain/

https://news.yahoo.com/watch-live-us-moon-landing-how-to-stream-lunar-lander-intuitive-machines-odysseus-houston-apollo-nasa-164032673.html

https://science.slashdot.org/story/24/02/22/1545243/varda-space-rocket-lab-nail-first-of-its-kind-spacecraft-landing-in-utah


And finally, Japan joined the club of countries to land unmanned probes on the moon last month. The lander is named SLIM, standing for Smart Lander for Investigating Moon. And while smart, it proved that space is hard: one of its engines failed in its landing descent and it flipped over and landed on its head.

This caused a bit of a problem with its solar panels generating power, and it took ten days for the spacecraft to power up. SLIM carried a couple of miniature rovers to move about and snap pictures, and here is the extremely cool part of this: one of the rovers was made by a TOY COMPANY! It's a company that specialized in Transformer-like robots, which is really a smart move. It's basically stored as a sphere, but it extends on an eccentric basis so that when it rolls, the two halves are offset, giving it better steering ability on the uneven terrain. Unfortunately the articles that I recovered did not have photos of the rover.

Japan is the fifth country to successfully land on the moon, following the USA, Russia, China, and India.

The CNN article has a really good photo of the lander, pity it landed on its head.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/29/asia/japan-moon-sniper-lander-resumes-intl-hnk-scn/index.html
thewayne: (Default)
Ed Clark had been in charge of the Max program for almost three years. He came up through the ranks and had been with Boeing for 18 years, having previously been chief engineer and chief 737 mechanic. He knows the plane.

This is purely sacrificial, a move by the board to appease investors. There was also a shuffling of directors and the creation of a new director position. See: Titanic and deck chair rearrangement. If they don't stop putting shareholder return above safety, it's not going to do a damn thing to improve the situation. Clark was not the reason those bolts weren't there, it was the board's drive for money by more rapidly pushing the planes out the door and increasing deliverables. Also a crappy ticketing system.

And this is what the board is trying to appease: "Beyond the problems that have resulted in the grounding of the 737 Max 8 and Max 9 after the incidents, the problems at Boeing have also postponed certification of two new versions of the jet, the Max 7 and a stretched version, the Max 10.

The CEOs of three key Boeing customers – United Airlines, Southwest and Delta Air Lines – have recently all said they no longer are counting on getting those new versions of the planes they had ordered anytime soon. United CEO Scott Kirby referred to the Alaska Air incident as the “straw that broke the camel’s back” in terms of his airline’s planning assumptions for the Max 10."
Southwest's entire fleet is almost 100% 737. They did this to standardize maintenance operations. If Southwest is willing to break that up, that's seriously bad news for Boeing.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/21/business/boeing-removes-head-of-737-max-program-in-wake-of-safety-incidents/index.html

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/24/02/24/0553215/boeing-removes-head-of-its-737-max-program-after-januarys-door-bolts-incident
thewayne: (Default)
"Welcome to the end of democracy. We are here to overthrow it completely. We didn't get all the way there on January 6, but we will endeavor to get rid of it."
-- Conservative activist Jack Posobiec, to cheering CPAC audience

"Amen!"
-- Steve Bannon, in response

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123456 7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 03:48 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios