Psychologist Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment several years ago at Stanford where some students were "prisoners" and others "jailers". It was a behavioralism experiment that had to be terminated when several students had nervous breakdowns and the guards began abusing the prisoners, including forcing them into simulated sex acts.
This is an interview with him discussing how things like Abu Ghraib could happen. Interesting stuff.
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2008/02/ted_zimbardo?currentPage=all
This is an interview with him discussing how things like Abu Ghraib could happen. Interesting stuff.
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2008/02/ted_zimbardo?currentPage=all
no subject
Date: 2008-03-30 08:28 pm (UTC)He contends that if you come up with some "agreed upon" moral rights and wrongs (utterly impossible, LOL) you can condition kids to not step over the evil line. Yet he also states that "Heroes have to always, at the heroic decisive moment, break from the crowd and do something different." So why is he advocating more group-think?
What we really need to teach people is to say "fuck you, I'm not doing that/agreeing with that" and help them develop strategies to deal with whatever consequences result. It's something I practice frequently. Of course, a lot of people hate me, so YMMV. Henry David Thoreau for the win!
no subject
Date: 2008-03-30 08:36 pm (UTC)