I would say that's a fair assessment. If you look at it from an economic perspective, the ones with the most money have the biggest weapons, and it's those who can most ill afford to rebuild who are on the receiving end of those weapons. Not to mention that those on the receiving end are frequently dead, thus increasing the difficulty of rebuilding.
Quite. Not to mention that situations like the ones that tend to produce those hollowed-out shells of villages are not usually one-shot affairs, and so the danger has to calm down before people can come back and rebuild.
no subject
Date: 2008-06-14 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-14 11:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-06-15 12:07 am (UTC)