FAA: "You can't handle the truth!"
Apr. 1st, 2009 06:14 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Every day I eat my breakfast 200 yards from a pelican who'd like nothing better than to put its beak through my brain!
Sorry, been a little ill of late and my brain is always weird. And when you're weird, who better to channel than Jack?!
Anyway, after that flight went down in NYC from birds taking out its engines, the FAA said it was going to release bird strike data. Now they're saying they won't. They say: ""The complexity of the information warrants care with its interpretation; releasing this information without benefit of proper analysis would not only produce an inaccurate perception of the individual airports and airlines but also inaccurate and inappropriate comparisons between airports/airlines," the FAA wrote March 19 in the Federal Register."
Well, I have to agree with them, at least partially. It would be easy for a layperson to misinterpret the data and draw some pretty stupid conclusions. But there's also an awful lot of aviation engineers and wildlife management specialists who would love to see these data sets who would otherwise absolutely love to see this data.
But here's the scary part: "The number of strikes annually reported more than quadrupled from 1,759 in 1990 to a record 7,666 in 2007."
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/03/faa-says-public.html
Sorry, been a little ill of late and my brain is always weird. And when you're weird, who better to channel than Jack?!
Anyway, after that flight went down in NYC from birds taking out its engines, the FAA said it was going to release bird strike data. Now they're saying they won't. They say: ""The complexity of the information warrants care with its interpretation; releasing this information without benefit of proper analysis would not only produce an inaccurate perception of the individual airports and airlines but also inaccurate and inappropriate comparisons between airports/airlines," the FAA wrote March 19 in the Federal Register."
Well, I have to agree with them, at least partially. It would be easy for a layperson to misinterpret the data and draw some pretty stupid conclusions. But there's also an awful lot of aviation engineers and wildlife management specialists who would love to see these data sets who would otherwise absolutely love to see this data.
But here's the scary part: "The number of strikes annually reported more than quadrupled from 1,759 in 1990 to a record 7,666 in 2007."
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2009/03/faa-says-public.html
no subject
Date: 2009-04-01 06:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-01 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-02 04:12 am (UTC)Good to see you online, kiddo! I hope you're doing well.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 12:26 am (UTC)I am! Sorry I've been gone so long. It's been weird and now I feel all better for being online and reconnecting. How are you??
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 12:50 am (UTC)Made some EXTREMELY yummy meatballs and am about to have some for dinner. Also made an extremely yummy tomato sauce to go with it, won't bother with cooking pasta tonight.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 12:54 am (UTC)Meatballs are love, pasta just weighs it down. ;D
no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 02:33 am (UTC)They are REALLY good. And if you make 'em small, say just under an inch, you get lots out of this recipe.
I'll be posting more about my surgery later, I'm also doing a presentation or two at work. It's a good idea to watch your ergonomics if you're going to be using a computer regularly. Trust me: you don't want to go through this surgery. It really isn't too bad, in and of itself, but it's a long and inconvenient recovery.
no subject
Date: 2009-04-02 04:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-04-03 12:22 am (UTC)