thewayne: (Default)
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

You didn't actually believe them, did you? After all, most of Big G's revenue is derived from selling advertising.

Well, today Google said that they are formally NOT going to follow through on their promise to block third-party cookies in their browser.

I AM SHOCKED, SHOCKED I SAY!

No, not really.

There's a reason why I don't use their browser, and not trusting Google at their word is one of them.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/07/google-will-not-disable-tracking-cookies-in-chrome-after-years-of-trying/

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/24/07/22/2055228/google-wont-be-deprecating-third-party-cookies-in-chrome-after-all
thewayne: (Default)
Google's extensions system is known as Manifest, and it's currently at V2. V3 launches next week, and it's going to break a lot, if not all, of V2. Ad blockers, etc.

They announced V3 in 2019 and it's been oft delayed, but will now be launched. And lots of controversy is following it, particularly with ad blockers and content filtering. Keep in mind that Google is - first and always - a company built around serving ads.

From the article: "A big source of skepticism around Manifest V3 is limitations around "content filtering," aka the APIs ad blockers and anti-tracking extensions use to fight ad companies like Google. Google, which makes about 77 percent of its revenue from advertising, has not published a serious explanation as to why Manifest V3 limits content filtering, and it's not clear how that aligns with the goals of "improving the security, privacy, performance and trustworthiness." Like Kewisch said, the primary goal of malicious extensions is to spy on users and slurp up data, which has nothing to do with content filtering. This is all happening while Google is building an ad system directly into Chrome, and Google properties like YouTube are making aggressive moves against ad blockers." (emphasis mine)

It's not easy to not use Google, I use their email as mostly receive-only (newsletters mainly) and their search engine, and that's about it. As bad as it's become through it getting gamed, it's still pretty good.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/05/google-starts-deprecating-older-more-capable-chrome-extensions-next-week/
thewayne: (Cyranose)
In two weeks we'll be in Phoenix and our trip to Europe begins! I can't tell you how much I'm looking forward to this!

I had two concerns. First, I didn't want to take my laptop, a MacBook Air. Yes, it's light. But it's a lot more power than I really needed for this trip, and it's valuable.

So I bought an Asus Chromebook. $200 from Amazon for 4 gig of memory and 16 gig of storage, plus I have a spare 16 gig MicroSD card sitting around that is loading up with books even as we speak.

I have a specific list of tasks for the Chromebook: long battery life (it's obscene -- 10-13 hours!), light document/spreadsheet editing (I want to work on/revise two game designs while I'm traveling), copying photos nightly to flash drives in case of theft or equipment failure, and reading material for the trans-Atlantic flights, which the battery life and plethora of epubs that are copying right now will provide.

I hesitate to say that the Chromebook is NOT a laptop. It has a full-size keyboard, I opted for the just under 12" screen, it has ports for USB, HDMI, MicroSD, it has cameras and sound. No, it doesn't have much storage, just under 10 gig available. But when you think about the laptops that we had just ten years ago that might have 300-500 MEG of storage available, I think it's survivable.

The limitation is that you're initially bound to the Chrome OS from Google, something that evolved from Unix/Linux and their Android phone/tablet OS. Your apps are limited to what's available on the Google Play store, and there's a box that you can check to note that they can work offline.

This is an important thing to keep in mind -- if you want to use it effectively while away from WiFi, say, on a trans-Atlantic flight, you need to make sure your data and apps are on the system and not in Google's cloud.

I am quite impressed by its capability. The keyboard has a very good feel, the trackpad is very responsive and responds to taps -- it doesn't have to be pushed down to click, the display is very bright and hi-res. I wish the keyboard had backlighting like my Air does, but for $200 that's too much to expect.

Aside from the application issue and the minor point of keyboard lights, I currently have two complaints. First, the keyboard mapping is similar to OS-X mapping, but not identical. Neither is it like Windows mapping. And the limited instructions and on-screen tutorial don't tell you what the functions are. So you'll end up scrounging around online trying to find out how to use it. Second, and related to the first, is the OS is not 'out of the box intuitive' to use. I've puzzled out a few things, but I really wish the provided onscreen tutorial had taught me more.

Oh, and here's a neat part: you can install Ubuntu on it! I'm not going to mess with that before the trip, but I might in a month when we get back. Two of my friends have done that and are very happy.

This is quite an awesome device. And for $200, though I don't want to think of it as disposable, if someone steals it or it gets broken, I'm not going to cry too hard. There's a model for $170/180 with 2 gig of memory and 16 gig of storage, I figured the price difference for 4 gig was trivial and got the additional memory.

AND MAN, IS IT LIGHT! This thing is lighter than my wife's iPad 2! It's definitely lighter than my Air: this thing weighs 2 lbs 6 ounces! My iPad Mini weighs 1 lb 5 oz. It's pretty scary light. And small. It's going to make my backpack much more bearable shlepping through airports in 2 weeks!


And now, I'm off to Three Rivers Petroglyphs site to continue familiarizing myself with my new camera and give it a good workout, which I'll post about tonight or tomorrow!
thewayne: (Default)
It did on mine. I installed it two months ago to check it out. I went back to using Firefox because there were a couple of behaviors in Chrome that I didn't care for, so today I decided to update it and see if those behaviors had changed.

I opened Chrome and it was already at the latest version. With no interaction from me.

I do not allow ANYTHING to update software on my computer without my explicit approval. I'm not happy at all that Google would silently update their browser without my permission.

If I don't get a satisfactory answer from them soon on how I can turn this off, I'm ripping it out by the root and possibly canceling my Gmail accounts.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123456 7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 12th, 2025 04:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios