thewayne: (Default)
Aside from taking one night off between the two series, we saw them one night apiece, and it was quite a slog as each of the Lord of the Rings movies were the extended editions and those things are 5 hours each! And we had a bit of a heart stop when the DVD player locked up about 10 minutes in to the first movie! No idea what happened, ended up having to unplug it to free it up, it was fine thereafter. Also odd was that I split the sound so that the audio from movies comes through my Onkyo receiver and my B&W speakers, and that worked for the first movie, but then I don't know what happened, but maybe the receiver died? Fortunately the new TV has pretty good sound, but it has to be turned up loud, like around 80+ on a 0-100 scale. We also ended up renting The Return of the King through iTunes: turned out that the surplus of Hobbit movies at the two used book stores in Las Cruces was entirely in my mind. We could have bought a new one easily enough, but were kind of fixated on a used copy. Of course when you look at the cost of the rental plus the used, we're probably at the cost of a new.

Now whenever someone does something stupid in traffic I'm likely to exclaim FOOL OF A TOOK! for some time.

It was nice seeing all of the movies in logical order since the movies were made in the Rings/Hobbit order. I have no idea what order I originally read them in, it's far too many years and books ago. I remember when my wife first found me online that one of the reasons she wanted to come to Phoenix was to see one of the movies in a good theater, which we did.

My wife made the observation that pretty much all of the female roles were added in, such as Tauriel in the Hobbit series - created whole-cloth for the movie, otherwise there wouldn't be any women in the first movies except for Galadriel's cameos, and I don't remember if she appeared in the book, too long since I've reread it. You had Eowyn, vital in the third Rings movie and just a foreshadowing in the second, and Arwen who wasn't much more than a plot complication except early in the first movie.

While I know we watched the Rings extended editions when we got them, apparently I really didn't remember them. The additional footage was quite good, and I think Peter Jackson - for the most part - did an excellent job bringing the books to the screen. There are somethings that were big mistakes, like Aragorn's "death", and some things that just did not work for me on a technical basis like when they used children or little people as stand-ins for the hobbits in long shots. They just didn't work. I don't know if costume alterations could have made it work or what, but a straight stand-in substitution just didn't work for me. I didn't spot a couple of editing mistakes that were made in the theatrical releases, so those must have been corrected for the extended DVDs.

The extended release DVDs are on two discs, I wonder if a single BluRay could hold the full five hour movie. Obviously it couldn't hold the movie and the bonus content. Maybe it's best to have it on two discs so you have a convenient intermissions point.

Still, we really enjoyed doing something that we've never done before. It's a heck of a time commitment, but my recovery made this an ideal time to do it. My one regret was not laying down a hard and fast rule to start the Lord of the Rings movies at 7pm, getting to bed for me at close to 3am was rough, but my wife had to do some remote work on the telescope so starting early wasn't in the cards. She really appreciated it as Middle Earth is a really special fanfic for her and she's written some really good stuff on AO3 for it.
thewayne: (Default)
One of my goals during my convalescence was to watch all six Hobbit/Lord of the Rings movies, one per night. That's what, 15 hours or more of movies? Plus others that I want to watch again. During my cleanup a couple of weeks ago when my friend Dave was en route, which included removing lots of movies from the coffee table, I found one of the Hobbit movies, which I put in one of the cabinets in which we store said DVDs and Blurays. I try to keep series together.

Last night we watched the first, The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. Afterwards I went found the second, The Desolation of Smaug, and tore apart the box that I put the DVDs in looking for The Battle of Five Armies. Couldn't find it anywhere. My wife has her own pile of DVDs that she's taken to work to watch. It wasn't there. She checked the backpack that she takes said DVDs to work. It wasn't there. Finally I check the spreadsheet that I have my video library cataloged in.

It wasn't there!

Apparently I never bought it!

I wanted to go to Alamogordo tomorrow to buy some carrots, among other things, hopefully we can also pick up a copy of the final Hobbit movie and we can complete my original plan.

I'm just flabbergasted that I didn't get it when it was first released. Very uncharacteristic of me.
thewayne: (Default)
This installment focuses mainly on 3-D technology. He had FORTY-EIGHT Red cameras shooting at 5,000 lines of resolution and 48 frames a second. It looks like the end result should be quite amazing, but I'm wondering if today's projectors can project at 48 FPS or if it will have to be down-sampled.

Still, pretty cool.

I am not a fan of 3-D as my readers know, but he's going to some great extremes to do it right, so maybe it'll be worthwhile.

http://www.wired.com/underwire/2011/11/peter-jackson-geeks-out-on-3-d-in-latest-hobbit-video/
thewayne: (Default)
10:30 of pre-production goodness! It looks like pretty much everyone from the movie trilogy returned who would be needed for the prequel.

The Hobbit Movie Blog: http://thehobbitmovieblog.blogspot.com/

The actual video diary vid: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7RnPfnkoWY


The video was originally linked in the blog, but some ass filed a DMCA claim and it was taken down. Peter Jackson has protested the filing, but YouTube usually acts instantly on takedown notices without giving the person who posted it a chance to respond.


It looks REALLY good. They're faithfully rebuilding the sets from the movies, and it looks like they're filming it linearly/chronologically. My only problem: THEY'RE FILMING IT IN EFFING 3-D.
thewayne: (Default)
I don't recognize most of the names, no confirmation on Ian McKellan and Andy Serkis returning as Gandalf and Gollum.

http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2010/10/the-hobbit-has-a-cast-and-a-very-british-one/
thewayne: (Default)
Like this is a surprise. I had no doubt, there's too much money to be made on it.

And it looks like it will be in 3-D.

There are three things that I find interesting about 3-D (in a negative way). 1: it doesn't seem to be making the transition in to living rooms. Apparently 3-D TV sales are extremely low, and I didn't know this: they aren't mutually compatible. So if you have a Sony 3-D TV and I have a Panasonic 3-D TV, your glasses (currently) won't work on my TV. 2: very little material is being released for it, some of the best material is only available when you buy a 3-D set. And 3: you need an upright viewing position to watch it. That last one, in and of itself, is a deal-breaker for me. I frequently watch TV laying sideways in my chair, horizontal is a favored viewing position for me.

Not that it matters, I'm not going to buy one. My TV is over a decade old, weighs a ton and a half, but only costs about $75 to repair. I'm planning on running it in to the ground.

http://www.stuff.co.nz/4241119/Jackson-to-direct-The-Hobbit-in-3-D
thewayne: (Default)
The good news: Warner and MGM are close to striking a deal which may allow the film to begin production with Peter Jackson at the helm. If they can start production, we'd be looking at 12/2012 for the first movie, the second about a year later. It is not yet finalized and formally announced, but it looks very promising. There's lots of things to be finalized, including some actor's guild problems that could cause the production to be moved from New Zealand to Europe, but I'm sure everything will be resolved.

The bad news: it's going to be shot in 3-D.

*sigh*

http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/01/mgm-and-warner-near-on-deal-for-hobbit-films/

http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/10/10/04/1535205/MGM-and-Warner-Near-On-Deal-For-Hobbit-Films
thewayne: (Default)
First I'd heard about it. I wonder if Jackson will do it, he's already producing it and he'd probably have a significant hand in it anyway. The reason given: startup delays, which means MGM's frailty. Jackson said: “...“The bottom line is that Guillermo just didn’t feel he could commit six years to living in New Zealand, exclusively making these films, when his original commitment was for three years. ...”

http://www.theonering.net/torwp/2010/05/30/36920-guillermo-del-toro-departs-the-hobbit/
thewayne: (Default)
Main production on The Hobbit has not been greenlit because of MGM and their potential insolvency. They're well along in designing sets, effects, makeup, and costumes, but apparently everything's on hold. The article implies that they can begin production as soon as they get the OK, there's just no telling when that will be.

http://www.torontosun.com/entertainment/movies/2010/05/28/14173166-wenn-story.html

http://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/10/05/28/2049209/The-Hobbit-On-Hold?art_pos=11
thewayne: (Default)
In case you hadn't heard. Apparently he's moving to New Zealand for four years after Hell Boy 2 opens.

http://blog.wired.com/underwire/2008/04/del-toro-set-to.html

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-hobbitt25apr25,1,6111273.story

http://entertainment.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/04/25/0143212

And if you're a glutton for punishment, the article has a link to Leonard Nimoy "singing" The Ballod of Bilbo Baggins in all it's 60's flower power glory.

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 12345 6
789 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 13th, 2025 01:09 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios