thewayne: (Default)
Now, I have to admit that I didn't know there was such a thing as smart beds. I'm not in the least bit surprised, but I didn't know it.

First, the problem. Amazon Web Services, AWS, had a DNS problem that clobbered a whole bunch of systems around the world that relied on processes running within their cloud services. We had problems at work in the library Monday and Tuesday, though those seem to be clearing up. The data center that had the problem is one of Amazon's oldest, and it's had serious problems before in 2020 and 2021.

(In short, DNS translates domain names, such as Amazon.com, into internet server addresses, such as 192.68.25.1, and sends data requests to the correct server. If it gets borked and you're a data packet, it becomes a lot more difficult to get where you need to go.)

This is why I'm an advocate of not having your IT system relying on cloud systems! But management likes to think they're saving money by putting stuff "in the cloud" where people have little direct control over things and security risks multiple. But whatever, as long as management is happy.

So, these "smart beds". They're made by a company called Eight Sleep. Not only do the beds cost $5,000, you pay $200-$500 annually for this bed to be connected to the internet so it can adjust its position, temperature, "provide soundscapes and vibrational alarms", etc.

GAH!

Whatever. I guess if you have the cash to throw $5K at a bed, go have fun. I'm not going to do it.

ANYWAY, when the DNS problem happened, and the bed could no longer talk to the spymothership, the beds freaked out (probably along with their owners), including some folding themselves double. Apparently Eight Sleep's programmers never considered a scenario where the beds lost connectivity and didn't design a fail safe mode for the bed to, you know, just be a bed. The CEO of the idioticsmart bed company said "...engineers were racing to build an outage-proof mode in the event of a future outage." Livestock, meet barn with open doors.

"Sorry, boss. I was late today because someone unplugged my bed."

I am going to laugh my butt off if this company goes bankrupt and all of those beds freak out or die when the servers get unplugged.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/technology/cloud-computing/smart-beds-flipped-out-during-the-aws-outage-and-so-did-their-sleepy-owners/ar-AA1OYol8

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/25/10/22/1347211/smart-beds-malfunctioned-during-aws-outage
thewayne: (Default)
This is just too stupid to not quote the article. Then again, we are talking about an Islamic fundamentalist state, which is so fundamentalist that it is quite stupid. So here's the quote: "It’s the first time a ban of this kind has been imposed since the Taliban seized power in August 2021, and leaves government offices, the private sector, public institutions, and homes in northern Balkh province without Wi-Fi internet. Mobile internet remains functional, however.

Haji Attaullah Zaid, a provincial government spokesman, said there was no longer cable internet access in Balkh by order of a “complete ban” from the leader Hibatullah Akhundzada.

“This measure was taken to prevent immorality, and an alternative will be built within the country for necessities,” Zaid told The Associated Press. He gave no further information, including why Balkh was chosen for the ban or if the shutdown would spread to other provinces."


Good luck creating that 'alternative'. I'm sure there's lots of people willing to sell you copies of Novell Netware and can lay coax cable for you. Meanwhile, families will be leaving the province and I expect you're going to see more young people thinking about pulling a Russian Exodus and never returning.

While they talk about cellular WiFi being available, it's slow and expensive and apparently also failing due to 'technical issues'.

https://apnews.com/article/afghanistan-taliban-internet-ban-balkh-0554049d724b8c8e0fb1e668ff34bbd2
thewayne: (Default)
My first thought was 'AOL is still around?' Turns out that yes, it was. They had a terrible merger with Time-Warner, then were bought out by Verizon then are now owned by Yahoo? But they still exist. And until the end of September, will still have modem banks that people can access.

Modems? Modems are still made? I can't remember the last time I saw a modem in a store, much less connected to working hardware.

Apparently dial-up internet is still sort of big in rural areas, which makes sense. Not having DSL, much less fiber, dial-up is the best that can be managed. After AOL shuts down its modem banks, dial-up will still be available from Earthlink, Juno, MSN, and NetZero, and probably other smaller, local ISPs.

https://www.tomshardware.com/service-providers/network-providers/aol-will-end-dial-up-internet-service-in-september-34-years-after-its-debut-aol-shield-browser-and-aol-dialer-software-will-be-shuttered-on-the-same-day

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/25/08/10/0626249/aol-finally-discontinues-its-dial-up-internet-access---after-34-years
thewayne: (Default)
Sunday marked the 30th anniversary of CERN releasing the WWW to the public! (Now) Sir Tim Berners-Lee developed the concept of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) to make it easier to share information within CERN among their scientists, running on a computer that Steve Jobs helped create after he was kicked out of Apple, The NeXT Step. It was an amazingly powerful computer and included an optical drive - not a CD - for storage!

The NeXT basically became the prototype for the later Mac operating systems when Jobs returned to Apple.

The Register article, though short, has some very good material in it.

https://www.theregister.com/2023/05/02/world_wide_web_30th_anniversary/

https://tech.slashdot.org/story/23/05/02/167232/cern-celebrates-30-years-since-releasing-the-web-to-the-public-domain

And just to be pedantic, the Internet and the World Wide Web are two different things! The internet is a communications network: the hardware and protocols for moving information between hosts (a host is any device that connects to the internet). WWW is the software, such as the web browser that you're using right now, that makes it a heck of a lot more easier for end users to benefit from it.
thewayne: (Default)
In a variation on swatting, you can now go online, ask if people live in a particular city, and offer money to enact revenge on particular targets. $3,000 for tire slashings, throw bricks through windows, etc. Typically a slogan is shouted so the victim knows why it's being done. You need to arrange for someone to video you doing it so the buyer knows they're getting value for their hard- (and probably illegally-) earned money. Probably need to arrange for a getaway driver, too.

Lovely world we're evolving in to, eh?

https://krebsonsecurity.com/2022/09/violence-as-a-service-brickings-firebombings-shootings-for-hire/
thewayne: (Default)
This is absolute insanity and stands little hope of winning in court, or appeal. From the article:

Four cities in Indiana are suing Netflix and other video companies, claiming that online video providers and satellite-TV operators should have to pay the same franchise fees that cable companies pay for using local rights of way.

The lawsuit was filed against Netflix, Disney, Hulu, DirecTV, and Dish Network on August 4 in Indiana Commercial Court in Marion County. The cities of Indianapolis, Evansville, Valparaiso, and Fishers want the companies to pay the cable-franchise fees established in Indiana's Video Service Franchises (VSF) Act, which requires payments of 5 percent of gross revenue in each city.


Ignoring DirecTV, whose parent, AT&T, is hemorrhaging money on that purchase, they're stupid enough to sue DISNEY?! And note one name conspicuously absent: Amazon. Their Prime TV service uses the same cables. Again, Amazon has huge amounts of money - as do all of these defendants - to represent themselves in court. Probably more than the cities do. This is also extremely bad precedent because if they somehow win, then they've just destroyed the internet because every municipality can charge franchise fees: no more YouTube, taxes on everything at every level.

Internet services already pay connection fees to be carried over ISP services. Those fees are already paid in to city coffers. They do not add to infrastructure load. The cities are trying to double-dip. I understand and appreciate that cities are under tremendous financial burden, especially under these plague times: I've worked in city/state government almost my entire working life. But this is a monumentally stupid idea that is going to go down in flames.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2020/08/cities-sue-netflix-hulu-disney-claim-they-owe-cable-franchise-fees/

November 2025

S M T W T F S
       1
23 4567 8
9 10 111213 1415
1617 18 1920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Nov. 22nd, 2025 05:06 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios