Of the Big 3, I've felt that Chrysler has produced the most visually intriguing cars for a long time. Some I like, some I don't, but I at least look at them.
This particular one is pretty funky. It doesn't do much for me, but it is visually intriguing.
That one definitely looks different. I'd want to see what it looks like on the road (or the lot) to see whether I really like it or not, but it has potential.
Apparently that's NOT what the final product looks like; the picture is a completely different concept model, also from Chrysler. Are they not showing a picture of the subject of the article because of this secrecy thing they're implying? Surely there must be a picture around somewhere.
If I were contemplating the car in the picture, I would want to give careful consideration to crumple zones and safety numbers for head-on collisions. Airbags can't do everything.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-10 04:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-10 12:37 pm (UTC)This particular one is pretty funky. It doesn't do much for me, but it is visually intriguing.
no subject
Date: 2008-09-10 02:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-10 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-09-10 07:32 pm (UTC)If I were contemplating the car in the picture, I would want to give careful consideration to crumple zones and safety numbers for head-on collisions. Airbags can't do everything.